These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36767321)

  • 1. Integrated Evaluation of the Aeroacoustics and Psychoacoustics of a Single Propeller.
    Sun J; Yonezawa K; Shima E; Liu H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of perceived annoyance caused by an electric drone noise through its technical, operational, and psychoacoustic parameters.
    König R; Babetto L; Gerlach A; Fels J; Stumpf E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Sep; 156(3):1929-1941. PubMed ID: 39315887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychoacoustic analysis of contra-rotating propeller noise for unmanned aerial vehicles.
    Torija AJ; Chaitanya P; Li Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):835. PubMed ID: 33639829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychoacoustic modelling of rotor noise.
    Torija AJ; Li Z; Chaitanya P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):1804. PubMed ID: 35364939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise.
    Torija AJ; Nicholls RK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35328839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of the Psychoacoustic Effect of Noise from Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
    Hui CTJ; Kingan MJ; Hioka Y; Schmid G; Dodd G; Dirks KN; Edlin S; Mascarenhas S; Shim YM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on sound quality prediction of vehicle interior noise using the human-ear physiological model.
    Zhao Y; Liu H; Guo W; He Z; Yang J; Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Aug; 156(2):989-1003. PubMed ID: 39136635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term noise annoyance towards drones and other transportation noise sources: A laboratory study.
    Kawai C; Jäggi J; Georgiou F; Meister J; Pieren R; Schäffer B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Oct; 156(4):2578-2595. PubMed ID: 39404357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discomfort estimation for aircraft cabin noise using linear regression and modified psychoacoustic annoyance approaches.
    Huang Y; Lv B; Ni K; Jiang W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):1963-1976. PubMed ID: 37782118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating multidimensional characteristics of noise signals with tones from building mechanical systems and their effects on annoyance.
    Lee J; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):108. PubMed ID: 32006968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of snoring sound by psychoacoustic parameters.
    Herzog M; Bremert T; Herzog B; Hosemann W; Kaftan H; Müller A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 20859635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.
    Rohrmeier C; Herzog M; Haubner F; Kuehnel TS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1537-43. PubMed ID: 22167475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction-based psychoacoustic analysis of multirotor noise under gusty wind conditions.
    Ko J; Kim Y; Jeong J; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Nov; 154(5):3004-3018. PubMed ID: 37955567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimental investigation of noise characteristics of overlapping propellers.
    Bu H; Ma Z; Zhong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):591. PubMed ID: 35931526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound quality metric indicators of rotorcraft noise annoyance using multilevel analysis.
    Boucher MA; Krishnamurthy S; Christian AW; Rizzi SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):867. PubMed ID: 36859124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are annoyance scores based on sound pressure levels suitable for snoring assessment in the home environment?
    Fischer R; Unverdorben F; Kuehnel TS; Vielsmeier V; Spanier G; Marcrum SC; Rohrmeier C
    Sleep Breath; 2021 Mar; 25(1):417-424. PubMed ID: 32462274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychoacoustic active noise control with ITU-R 468 noise weighting and its sound quality analysis.
    Bao H; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4323-6. PubMed ID: 21095758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using psychoacoustics of snoring sounds to screen for obstructive sleep apnea.
    Ng AK; Koh TS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1647-50. PubMed ID: 19162993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.