194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36769215)
1. Characterization of Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging.
Gonçalves JPL; Bollwein C; Noske A; Jacob A; Jank P; Loibl S; Nekljudova V; Fasching PA; Karn T; Marmé F; Müller V; Schem C; Sinn BV; Stickeler E; van Mackelenbergh M; Schmitt WD; Denkert C; Weichert W; Schwamborn K
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 36769215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distribution of molecular breast cancer subtypes among Algerian women and correlation with clinical and tumor characteristics: a population-based study.
Cherbal F; Gaceb H; Mehemmai C; Saiah I; Bakour R; Rouis AO; Boualga K; Benbrahim W; Mahfouf H
Breast Dis; 2015; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 25736840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 Genes for Predicting Survival in Triple-Negative and Hormone Receptor-Positive Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Uzelac B; Krivokuca A; Brankovic-Magic M; Magic Z; Susnjar S; Milovanovic Z; Supic G
Pathol Oncol Res; 2020 Oct; 26(4):2723-2731. PubMed ID: 32681437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Prognosis and Predictive Value of Estrogen Negative/Progesterone Positive (ER-/PR+) Phenotype: Experience of 1159 Primary Breast Cancer from a Single Institute.
Gamrani S; Boukansa S; Benbrahim Z; Mellas N; Fdili Alaoui F; Melhouf MA; Bouchikhi C; Banani A; Boubbou M; Bouhafa T; El Fatemi H
Breast J; 2022; 2022():9238804. PubMed ID: 35711896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subtype classification for prediction of prognosis of breast cancer from a biomarker panel: correlations and indications.
Chen C; Yuan JP; Wei W; Tu Y; Yao F; Yang XQ; Sun JZ; Sun SR; Li Y
Int J Nanomedicine; 2014; 9():1039-48. PubMed ID: 24591826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-throughput proteomics of breast cancer subtypes: Biological characterization and multiple candidate biomarker panels to patients' stratification.
Azevedo ALK; Gomig THB; Batista M; Marchini FK; Spautz CC; Rabinovich I; Sebastião APM; Oliveira JC; Gradia DF; Cavalli IJ; Ribeiro EMSF
J Proteomics; 2023 Aug; 285():104955. PubMed ID: 37390896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer classification.
Wang XZ; Liu Q; Sun JJ; Zuo WS; Hu DW; Ma SG; Mu DB; Yu ZY
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Apr; 14(2):4282-90. PubMed ID: 25966200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proteomic profiling of triple-negative breast carcinomas in combination with a three-tier orthogonal technology approach identifies Mage-A4 as potential therapeutic target in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.
Cabezón T; Gromova I; Gromov P; Serizawa R; Timmermans Wielenga V; Kroman N; Celis JE; Moreira JM
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Feb; 12(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 23172894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of survivin and EGFR protein expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.
Zhang M; Zhang X; Zhao S; Wang Y; Di W; Zhao G; Yang M; Zhang Q
Target Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 24233638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feline mammary basal-like adenocarcinomas: a potential model for human triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with basal-like subtype.
Wiese DA; Thaiwong T; Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V; Kiupel M
BMC Cancer; 2013 Sep; 13():403. PubMed ID: 24004841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinicopathological characteristics of triple negative breast cancer at a tertiary care hospital in India.
Dogra A; Doval DC; Sardana M; Chedi SK; Mehta A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10577-83. PubMed ID: 25605142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overexpression of Lox in triple-negative breast cancer.
Leo C; Cotic C; Pomp V; Fink D; Varga Z
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Jun; 34():98-102. PubMed ID: 29661738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Zinc distribution within breast cancer tissue of different intrinsic subtypes.
Rusch P; Hirner AV; Schmitz O; Kimmig R; Hoffmann O; Diel M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 32930875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nottingham Prognostic Index in triple-negative breast cancer: a reliable prognostic tool?
Albergaria A; Ricardo S; Milanezi F; Carneiro V; Amendoeira I; Vieira D; Cameselle-Teijeiro J; Schmitt F
BMC Cancer; 2011 Jul; 11():299. PubMed ID: 21762477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Impact of Discordance in Hormone Receptor Status Between Primary and Recurrent Sites in Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Shiino S; Kinoshita T; Yoshida M; Jimbo K; Asaga S; Takayama S; Tsuda H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Aug; 16(4):e133-40. PubMed ID: 27268749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Significance of Single Progesterone Receptor Positivity: A Comparison Study of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive/Her2 Negative Primary Breast Cancer With Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
Fan Y; Ding X; Xu B; Ma F; Yuan P; Wang J; Zhang P; Li Q; Luo Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Nov; 94(46):e2066. PubMed ID: 26579819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of breast tumor heterogeneity for ER status, HER2 status, and TN molecular subtype evaluation on DCE-MRI.
Chang RF; Chen HH; Chang YC; Huang CS; Chen JH; Lo CM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):809-819. PubMed ID: 26968141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer in Ethiopia: evidence for geographic difference in the distribution of molecular subtypes in Africa.
Hadgu E; Seifu D; Tigneh W; Bokretsion Y; Bekele A; Abebe M; Sollie T; Merajver SD; Karlsson C; Karlsson MG
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 29444670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of differentially expressed proteins between HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer and their prognostic significance.
Wei Z; Sijia F; Rui T; Yang L; Jianjun H; Bin W; Jing X
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Dec; 55():151834. PubMed ID: 34610510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 'Triple negative' epithelial ovarian cancer and pathologic markers for prognosis.
Liu N; Wang X; Sheng X
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21150601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
