These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36769591)

  • 1. A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models.
    Kardach H; Szponar-Żurowska A; Biedziak B
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Alkhouli KW; Al-Shamak RM; Darwich KMA; Aljabban O; Alam MK; Kara-Boulad JM
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54869. PubMed ID: 38405645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
    Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
    Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models.
    Petrović V; Šlaj M; Buljan M; Čivljak T; Zulijani A; Perić B
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
    Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
    Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
    Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts.
    Fu X; Peng C; Li Z; Liu S; Tan M; Song J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178858. PubMed ID: 28640827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of iTero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Pan Y; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jan; 24(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33473018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility.
    Dalstra M; Melsen B
    J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):36-41; discussion 14. PubMed ID: 19286874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.