136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36769809)
1. Survival Outcome of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes: A Nomogram- and Machine-Learning-Based Approach.
Lai Y; Xie J; Yin X; Lai W; Tang J; Du Y; Li Z
J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Removal of Lymph Nodes on Survival in Stage I-III Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Cancer: The More, the Better?
Jiang Y; Shao X; Li W; Hu H; Lu Y; Li Y; Tian Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):783-791. PubMed ID: 37991582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer.
Li H; Lin D; Yu Z; Li H; Zhao S; Hainisayimu T; Liu L; Wang K
Front Immunol; 2022; 13():947802. PubMed ID: 36405735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel pN3 gastric cancer staging system with superior prognostic utility based upon the examination of over 31 lymph nodes: a propensity score-matching analysis.
Hu Q; Pan S; Guo Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):352. PubMed ID: 34563111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The minimum number of examined lymph nodes was 24 for optimal survival of pathological T2-4 gastric cancer: a multi-center, hospital-based study covering 20 years of data.
Zhao L; Zhang F; Jiao F; Zhou X; Niu P; Han X; Wang W; Luan X; He M; Guan Q; Li Y; Zhao D; Gao J; Chen Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):892. PubMed ID: 37735628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Lymph Nodes Examined on Survival in ypN0 Gastric Cancer Patients: a Population-Based Study.
MingHua Z; KeCheng Z; ZhenYu C; Lin C; ChunXi W; ZeLong Y
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Apr; 25(4):919-925. PubMed ID: 32318943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of examined lymph node count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 pulmonary carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.
Yang H; Fang Z; Liu T; Zhu X; Luo L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Jan; 35(1):203-212. PubMed ID: 36319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Examined Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in Surgically Resected Early‑stage Pulmonary Typical Carcinoid Tumors?
Yang H; Liu T; Li M; Fang Z; Luo L
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Dec; 45(12):506-513. PubMed ID: 36413680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of examined lymph node count on staging and long-term survival of patients with node-negative stage III gastric cancer: a retrospective study using a Chinese multi-institutional registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data validation.
Zhang N; Bai H; Deng J; Wang W; Sun Z; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhou Z; Liang H
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Sep; 8(17):1075. PubMed ID: 33145294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The minimum number of examined lymph nodes for accurate nodal staging and optimal survival of stage T1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort with SEER database validation.
Tian D; Li HX; Yang YS; Yan HJ; Jiang KY; Zheng YB; Zong ZD; Zhang HL; Guo XG; Wen HY; Chen LQ
Int J Surg; 2022 Aug; 104():106764. PubMed ID: 35803513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of number of examined lymph nodes in patients with node-negative gastric cancer.
Jiao XG; Deng JY; Zhang RP; Wu LL; Wang L; Liu HG; Hao XS; Liang H
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 20(13):3640-8. PubMed ID: 24707149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The minimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate nodal staging and favorable prognosis in T1-2 supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhuge L; Wang S; Huang Z; Cai H; Li Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 49(10):107041. PubMed ID: 37633174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on stage migration in node-negative gastric cancer patients: a Chinese multi-institutional analysis with propensity score matching.
Gu P; Deng J; Wang W; Wang Z; Zhou Z; Xu H; Liang H
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Aug; 8(15):938. PubMed ID: 32953738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal examined lymph node count in node-negative colon cancer should be determined.
Feng H; Lyu Z; Liang W; Cai G; Deng Z; Jiang M; Wu D; Li Y
Future Oncol; 2021 Oct; 17(29):3865-3872. PubMed ID: 34287061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.
Yong J; Ding B; Dong Y; Yang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():994105. PubMed ID: 36203444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of examined lymph node count on prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma.
Li YF; Xiang YC; Zhang QQ; Wang WL
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Aug; 11(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 32953148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of examined lymph nodes number and metastatic lymph nodes ratio in overall survival and adjuvant treatment decision in resected laryngeal carcinoma.
Zhu X; Zhao M; Zhou L; Zhang M; Cao P; Tao L
Cancer Med; 2020 May; 9(9):3006-3014. PubMed ID: 32112627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Novel Criterion for Lymph Nodes Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study of the US SEER Database.
Wang W; Shen Z; Zhang J; Chen H; Deng X; Peng C; Xie J; Xu Z; Shen B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 34622372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A modified survival model for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on lymph nodes: A study based on SEER database and external validation.
Yang T; Huang S; Chen B; Chen Y; Liang W
Front Surg; 2022; 9():989408. PubMed ID: 36157416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
