These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36771950)

  • 1. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material.
    Kaptan A; Oznurhan F; Candan M
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36771950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural/Chemical Characterization and Bond Strength of a New Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Restorative.
    Yao C; Ahmed MH; Zhang F; Mercelis B; Van Landuyt KL; Huang C; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 32030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Assessment of Contemporary Ion-Releasing Restorative Dental Materials.
    Marovic D; Par M; Posavec K; Marić I; Štajdohar D; Muradbegović A; Tauböck TT; Attin T; Tarle Z
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials.
    Kumari A; Singh N
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2022; 9(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35174335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.
    Balagopal S; Nekkanti S; Kaur K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 34257171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers.
    Mederos M; León E; García A; Cuevas-Suárez CE; Hernández-Cabanillas JC; Rivera-Gonzaga JA; Grazioli G
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2024; 32():e20230219. PubMed ID: 38232277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.
    Pai D; Anirudhmaadhava PA; Ginjupalli K
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2024; 2024():9420336. PubMed ID: 38205145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear and microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin.
    Altunsoy M; Botsali MS; Korkut E; Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):874-9. PubMed ID: 24844786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin.
    Awliya WY; Akpata ES
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Dent Mater; 1996 May; 12(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 9002858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Keskus B; Oznurhan F
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Oct; 23(5):821-828. PubMed ID: 35864436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Dentin Surface Roughness, Drying Time, and Primer Application on Self-adhesive Composite-Cement Bond Strength.
    Son SA; Kim BN; Kim JH; Seo DG; Park JK
    J Adhes Dent; 2022 Apr; 24(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 35416441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of physical-chemical properties of bioactive glass ionomer cement.
    Ramos NBP; Felizardo KR; Berger SB; Guiraldo RD; Lopes MB
    Braz Dent J; 2024; 35():e245728. PubMed ID: 38537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.