147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36773740)
21. Trueness and precision of milled and 3D printed root-analogue implants: A comparative in vitro study.
Aldesoki M; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Evers-Dietze B; Elshazly TM; Bourauel C
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104425. PubMed ID: 36646269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing Techniques for Dimensional Accuracy in Clear Aligner Manufacturing.
Grzebieluch W; Grajzer M; Mikulewicz M
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Aug; 29():e940922. PubMed ID: 37533235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of additive manufacturing method and build angle on surface characteristics and Candida albicans adhesion to 3D printed denture base polymers.
Li P; Fernandez PK; Spintzyk S; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Unkovskiy A
J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103889. PubMed ID: 34800586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trueness and precision of digital light processing fabricated 3D printed monolithic zirconia crowns.
Refaie A; Bourauel C; Elshazly T; Evers-Dietze B; Alhotan A; Aldesoki M
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 148():105151. PubMed ID: 38909644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Rubayo DD; Phasuk K; Vickery JM; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 33143902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
Gao H; Yang Z; Lin WS; Tan J; Chen L
J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the influence of different build angles on the surface characteristics, accuracy, and dimensional stability of the complete denture base printed by digital light processing.
Yan S; Zhou JL; Zhang RJ; Tan FB
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e24095. PubMed ID: 38226211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers.
Johansson C; Dibes J; Rodriguez LEL; Papia E
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):339-347. PubMed ID: 33100299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part II: 3D printed Tübingen palatal plate prototype for newborns with Robin sequence.
Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):171. PubMed ID: 32546229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of build orientation on the trueness of occlusal splints fabricated by three-dimensional printing.
Cameron AB; Tong K; Tadakamadla S; Evans JL; Abuzar M
J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 37690838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology.
Alharbi N; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 27611757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of additively manufactured and steam sterilized surgical guides by means of continuous liquid interface production, stereolithography, digital light processing, and fused filament fabrication.
Burkhardt F; Handermann L; Rothlauf S; Gintaute A; Vach K; Spies BC; Lüchtenborg J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106418. PubMed ID: 38295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An In Vitro Study of Intaglio Surface, Periphery/Palatal Seal Area, and Primary Bearing Area Adaptation of 3D-Printed Denture Base Manufactured in Various Build Angles.
Charoenphol K; Peampring C
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():3824894. PubMed ID: 36440094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers.
Morón-Conejo B; López-Vilagran J; Cáceres D; Berrendero S; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2521-2532. PubMed ID: 36462040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of trueness and precision of stereolithography-fabricated photopolymer-resin dentures under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study.
Katheng A; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Hada T; Minakuchi S
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 33583615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Build angle effect on 3D-printed dental crowns marginal fit using digital light-processing and stereo-lithography technology: an in vitro study.
Farag E; Sabet A; Ebeid K; El Sergany O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38212816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
