These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36773740)
61. Effect of maximum support attachment angle on intaglio surface trueness of anatomic contour monolithic prostheses manufactured by digital light processing and zirconia suspension. Cho JH; Yoon HI; Oh JH; Kim DH J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):478-485. PubMed ID: 36621357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology. Msallem B; Sharma N; Cao S; Halbeisen FS; Zeilhofer HF; Thieringer FM J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32192099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Pure titanium denture large-span frameworks additively manufactured with selective laser melting]. Luo XP; Wei YX; Huang HN; Hu DD; Pang EL Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):646-651. PubMed ID: 34275219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study. Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Effect of storage temperature on the dimensional stability of DLP printed casts. Lee Y; Wang S; Yan P; Zhao Y; Liu Y J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):331.e1-331.e7. PubMed ID: 37978005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues. Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Accuracy of Dental Replica Models Using Photopolymer Materials in Additive Manufacturing: In Vitro Three-Dimensional Evaluation. Jin SJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim WC J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e557-e562. PubMed ID: 29968424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Tsolakis IA; Papaioannou W; Papadopoulou E; Dalampira M; Tsolakis AI Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study. Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Additive Manufacturing Technologies Used for Processing Polymers: Current Status and Potential Application in Prosthetic Dentistry. Revilla-León M; Özcan M J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):146-158. PubMed ID: 29682823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The effect of the angle of acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications. Ide Y; Nayar S; Logan H; Gallagher B; Wolfaardt J Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 26995273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques. Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Additive or subtractive manufacturing of crown patterns used for pressing or casting: A trueness analysis. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Cuellar AR; Kahveci Ç; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104221. PubMed ID: 35820503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing. Jin MC; Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Kim SH; Han JS J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Experimental study on dimensional variations of 3D printed dental models based on printing orientation. Perlea P; Stefanescu C; Dalaban MG; Petre AE Clin Case Rep; 2024 Mar; 12(3):e8630. PubMed ID: 38449896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing. Marcel R; Reinhard H; Andreas K Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4607-4615. PubMed ID: 32436163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Influence of print orientation on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of diagnostic casts manufactured with a daylight polymer printer. Maneiro Lojo J; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; Agustín-Panadero R; Yilmaz B; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36906414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Influence of planning software and template design on the accuracy of static computer assisted implant surgery performed using guides fabricated with material extrusion technology: An in vitro study. Rothlauf S; Pieralli S; Wesemann C; Burkhardt F; Vach K; Kernen F; Spies BC J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104482. PubMed ID: 36931618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts. Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]