128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36774241)
1. Optimizing effective dose and image quality in cone beam CT sialography.
Douglas DJ; Perschbacher SE; Moayedi M; Lam EWN
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 May; 135(5):686-697. PubMed ID: 36774241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of exposure parameters for cone beam computed tomography sialography.
Jadu FM; Hill ML; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 21831976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration.
Ludlow JB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21239575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose.
Pauwels R; Silkosessak O; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20140059. PubMed ID: 24708447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.
Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Falahat B; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150041. PubMed ID: 26119344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols.
Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
