These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36774241)

  • 21. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for dental cone-beam computed tomography in pediatric patients.
    Ito M; Chida K; Onodera S; Kojima I; Iikubo M; Kato T; Fujisawa M; Zuguchi M
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Sep; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37696261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
    Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro measurements of radiation exposure with different modalities (computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography) for imaging the petrous bone with a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom.
    Steiniger B; Lechel U; Reichenbach JR; Fiebich M; Aschenbach R; Schegerer A; Waginger M; Bobeva A; Teichgräber U; Mentzel HJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2022 May; 52(6):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 35460347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT.
    Nardi C; Talamonti C; Pallotta S; Saletti P; Calistri L; Cordopatri C; Colagrande S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170030. PubMed ID: 28511564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of subjective image quality, contrast to noise ratio and modulation transfer function in the middle ear using a novel full body cone beam computed tomography device.
    Heikkinen AK; Rissanen V; Aarnisalo AA; Nyman K; Sinkkonen ST; Koivisto J
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 37038130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
    Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging dose estimation and optimization: Need of daily cone-beam computed tomography.
    Trivedi G; Dixit CK; Oinam AS; Kapoor R; Bahl A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(3):470-474. PubMed ID: 31169206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
    Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The feasibility of cone beam computed tomographic sialography in the diagnosis of space-occupying lesions: report of 3 cases.
    Shahidi S; Hamedani S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jun; 117(6):e452-7. PubMed ID: 24745944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of varying cone beam computed tomography image resolution and field-of-view centralization on effective radiation dose.
    Jadu FM; Alzahrani AA; Almutairi MA; Al-Amoudi SO; Jan AM; Khafaji MA
    Saudi Med J; 2018 May; 39(5):470-475. PubMed ID: 29738006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose optimization in cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; McMillan C; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091911. PubMed ID: 24007162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
    Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
    Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose assessment from an online kilovoltage imaging system in radiation therapy.
    Osei EK; Schaly B; Fleck A; Charland P; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 19225181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and validation of a measurement-based source model for kilovoltage cone-beam CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations.
    McMillan K; McNitt-Gray M; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111907. PubMed ID: 24320440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of three-dimensional cone-beam CT sialography and MR sialography for the detection of non-tumorous salivary pathologies.
    Bertin H; Bonnet R; Le Thuaut A; Huon JF; Corre P; Frampas E; Langlois EM; Chesneau AD
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):463. PubMed ID: 37420227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absorbed dose measurements for kV-cone beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.
    Hioki K; Araki F; Ohno T; Nakaguchi Y; Tomiyama Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7297-313. PubMed ID: 25383908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.