These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3677467)

  • 41. Multifactorial disease risk calculator: Risk prediction for multifactorial disease pedigrees.
    Campbell DD; Li Y; Sham PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 42(2):130-133. PubMed ID: 29178360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Empowering sibship analyses with reference pedigrees.
    Wenk RE; Shao A
    Transfusion; 2012 Dec; 52(12):2614-9. PubMed ID: 22486247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A software tool for the graphical visualization of large and complex populations.
    Garbe JR; Da Y
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 14986440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MaGelLAn 1.0: a software to facilitate quantitative and population genetic analysis of maternal inheritance by combination of molecular and pedigree information.
    Ristov S; Brajkovic V; Cubric-Curik V; Michieli I; Curik I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 27613390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of linkage analysis methods for genome-wide scanning of extended pedigrees, with application to the TG/HDL-C ratio in the Framingham Heart Study.
    Horne BD; Malhotra A; Camp NJ;
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S93. PubMed ID: 14975161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reconstructing pedigrees: a combinatorial perspective.
    Steel M; Hein J
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 16325207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Localization of a prostate cancer predisposition gene to an 880-kb region on chromosome 22q12.3 in Utah high-risk pedigrees.
    Camp NJ; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright LA
    Cancer Res; 2006 Oct; 66(20):10205-12. PubMed ID: 17047086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal mortality in sibships of cases with neural tube defects.
    Lippman A
    Clin Genet; 1984 Dec; 26(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 6388917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An Extended Twin-Pedigree Study of Neuroticism in the Netherlands Twin Register.
    Boomsma DI; Helmer Q; Nieuwboer HA; Hottenga JJ; de Moor MH; van den Berg SM; Davies GE; Vink JM; Schouten MJ; Dolan CV; Willemsen G; Bartels M; van Beijsterveldt TCEM; Ligthart L; de Geus EJ
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jan; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29043520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. f-treeGC: a questionnaire-based family tree-creation software for genetic counseling and genome cohort studies.
    Tokutomi T; Fukushima A; Yamamoto K; Bansho Y; Hachiya T; Shimizu A
    BMC Med Genet; 2017 Jul; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 28705149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ped_Outlier software for automatic identification of within-family outliers.
    Zorkoltseva IV; Aulchenko YS; van Duijn CM; Axenovich TI
    Comput Biol Chem; 2010 Aug; 34(4):242-3. PubMed ID: 20884298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Algorithms for Pedigree Comparison.
    Chen ZZ; Feng Q; Shen C; Wang J; Wang L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(2):422-431. PubMed ID: 27076461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pedigree-drawing with R and graphviz.
    Zhao JH
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):1013-4. PubMed ID: 16488908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The art of pedigree drawing: algorithmic aspects.
    Tores F; Barillot E
    Bioinformatics; 2001 Feb; 17(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 11238074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Re-identification of familial database records.
    Malin B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():524-8. PubMed ID: 17238396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Methods for detecting gene x gene interaction in multiplex extended pedigrees.
    Brock GN; Maher BS; Goldstein TH; Cooper ME; Marazita ML
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S144. PubMed ID: 16451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accounting for epistasis in linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sung YJ; Wijsman EM
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 17283443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pedigree reconstruction using identity by descent.
    Kirkpatrick B; Li SC; Karp RM; Halperin E
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1481-93. PubMed ID: 22035331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.