These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3677660)

  • 1. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
    Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proallergens of formaldehyde applied in patch testing of formaldehyde contact allergy.
    Hansen J; Albrechtsen S; Hedegård K
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):838-40. PubMed ID: 2600209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
    Mitchell JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum eliciting patch test concentrations of cobalt.
    Allenby CF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Mar; 20(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 2498033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
    Goh CL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
    Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):846-9. PubMed ID: 2689478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol.
    Andersen KE; Carlsen L; Egsgaard H; Larsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 4085224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cross-sensitization among dye-intermediate agents using a modified lymphocyte transformation test.
    Li Q; Inagaki H; Minami M
    Arch Toxicol; 1996; 70(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 8740535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients.
    Lindelöf B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
    Szliska C; Rakoski J
    Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "edge effect" with patch test materials.
    Fyad A; Masmoudi ML; Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Mar; 16(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3581822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine patch testing with cadmium chloride.
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):293-6. PubMed ID: 606483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of cutaneous oedema in patch test reactions by measurement of skin thickness with high-frequency pulsed ultrasound.
    Serup J; Staberg B; Klemp P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Feb; 10(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 6713845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contradictory results following patch testing with Finn Chambers.
    Hammershøy O
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 7389334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.