These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3677831)

  • 1. Peer review in medical journals. A bad example.
    Larson CP
    Chest; 1987 Dec; 92(6):1124-5. PubMed ID: 3677831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The manuscript review process of nursing journals.
    Swanson E; McCloskey JC
    Image (IN); 1982 Oct; 14(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 6922826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Throw it away, Sam: the controlled circulation journals.
    Rennie D; Bero LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 2119127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial peer review in US medical journals.
    Weller AC
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1344-7. PubMed ID: 2406471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict in peer review.
    Lawrence DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):177-8. PubMed ID: 2351879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in medical journals.
    Robin ED; Burke CM
    Chest; 1987 Feb; 91(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 3802937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review in medical journals.
    Morgan P
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6521):646. PubMed ID: 3081207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review unmasked.
    Brunier G
    J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The last judgment?].
    Dunning AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Jan; 131(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 3821965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pretentious and deified papers].
    Amato Neto V
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2003; 36(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 12806469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How CMAJ controls the quality of its scientific articles.
    Bolster A; Morgan PP
    CMAJ; 1986 Feb; 134(4):301-3. PubMed ID: 3942936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top 10 reasons a manuscript is rejected.
    Sullivan EJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2002; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11859483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The quality of publications].
    Jiménez Villa J
    Aten Primaria; 1996 Apr; 17(6):367-8. PubMed ID: 8672639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The intent of peer-reviewed journals.
    Friedman SG
    Am J Surg; 1992 Jun; 163(6):633-5. PubMed ID: 1595844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appraising journals' reviewing procedures.
    Ong EL; Abbott J
    BMJ; 1991 Jun; 302(6790):1464-5. PubMed ID: 1750891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ["Virtual reality" in published sciences?].
    Niethard FU
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9027115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.