These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36778954)

  • 1. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220346. PubMed ID: 36778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research.
    Gupta A; Bosco F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281938. PubMed ID: 36827325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread
    Hartgerink CH
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3068. PubMed ID: 28265523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
    Bishop DV; Thompson PA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
    Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid
    Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Augusteijn HE; Bakker M; van Aert RC; van Assen MA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1832. PubMed ID: 27933012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.
    Schneck A
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4115. PubMed ID: 29204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
    Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
    Fitzpatrick BG; Gorman DM; Trombatore C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303262. PubMed ID: 38753677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
    Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.
    Singh AR; Singh SA
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2007 Jan; 5(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 22058616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
    Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.