155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36779654)
1. Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian A; Kudara Y; Ntovas P; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 36779654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.
Papaspyridakos P; AlFulaij F; Bokhary A; Sallustio A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 35176178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis K; Romeo D; Ercoli C; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):761-765. PubMed ID: 35871300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study.
Hassan B; Gimenez Gonzalez B; Tahmaseb A; Greven M; Wismeijer D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 27881321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Workflow With a Triple Scanning Technique for Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.
Papaspyridakos P; Mariano A; De Souza A; Kotina E; Kudara Y; Kang K
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33001661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Full Digital Workflow for Anterior Immediate Implants Using Custom Abutments.
Pinhata-Baptista OH; Kim JH; Choi IGG; Tateno RY; Costa C; Cortes ARG
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Apr; 47(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 32663281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body.
Ntovas P; Spanopoulou M; Martin W; Sykaras N
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):475-480. PubMed ID: 36244761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report.
Meneghetti P; Moura GF; Tavelli L; Li J; Siqueira R; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 34213055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Altered reverse impression method involving extraoral digitalization of a verification jig for the fabrication of implant-supported prosthesis by using a complete-digital workflow.
Rosmaninho A; Vedovato E; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 37882153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative analysis of the passivity of fit of complete arch implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different acquisition techniques.
Eid HS; Zohdy MM; Nour M; Salah T
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):477.e1-477.e8. PubMed ID: 38129259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
