These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36780019)

  • 1. The impact of diabetes mellitus on pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Eckhardt S; Laus K; DeAndrade S; Lee J; Nguyen J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Aug; 34(8):1859-1866. PubMed ID: 36780019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrence of Anterior Vaginal Prolapse After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Does Cervical Preservation Affect Outcome?
    Eckhardt SE; Lee JS; Nguyen JN
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 36735428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications: a case series.
    Goodwin AI; Torres J; O'Shaughnessy DL; Finamore PS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3231-3236. PubMed ID: 35267061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.
    Bolovis D; Hitzl W; Brucker C
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 34498174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery.
    Wallace SL; Kim Y; Lai E; Mehta S; Gaigbe-Togbe B; Zhang CA; Von Bargen EC; Sokol ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):317.e1-317.e12. PubMed ID: 35654113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.