These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36780185)

  • 1. Comparison of digital and visual tooth shade selection.
    Abu-Hossin S; Onbasi Y; Berger L; Troll F; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Apr; 9(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 36780185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination.
    Ebeid K; Sabet A; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):844-848. PubMed ID: 33227179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral instruments on shade determination compared to visual shade selection.
    Ebeid K; Sabet A; El Sergany O; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Sep; 34(6):988-993. PubMed ID: 35142422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracies of three intraoral scanners with regard to shade determination: An in vitro study.
    Huang M; Wang Y; Sun Y; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Ye H
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):111-117. PubMed ID: 35848886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of Intraoral Scanners in the Shade Matching Process: A Systematic Review.
    Akl MA; Mansour DE; Zheng F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 35919949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination.
    Rutkūnas V; Dirsė J; Bilius V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):322-329. PubMed ID: 31227232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital.
    Brandt J; Nelson S; Lauer HC; von Hehn U; Brandt S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2863-2871. PubMed ID: 28265772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy and characteristics of tooth-color matching by intraoral scanners based on Munsell color system: an in vivo study.
    Huang M; Ye H; Chen H; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Wang Y; Sun Y
    Odontology; 2022 Oct; 110(4):759-768. PubMed ID: 35212853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching procedures.
    Hampé-Kautz V; Salehi A; Senger B; Etienne O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(4):317-323. PubMed ID: 33491927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Study on Possibility of Clinical Application for Color Measurements of Shade Guides Using an Intraoral Digital Scanner.
    Yoon HI; Bae JW; Park JM; Chun YS; Kim MA; Kim M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):670-675. PubMed ID: 29377326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods.
    Mehl A; Bosch G; Fischer C; Ender A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):343-361. PubMed ID: 29292410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.
    Reyes J; Acosta P; Ventura D
    Heliyon; 2019 Jul; 5(7):e02100. PubMed ID: 31372552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
    Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
    Yılmaz B; Irmak Ö; Yaman BC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 31228358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review.
    Tabatabaian F; Beyabanaki E; Alirezaei P; Epakchi S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1084-1104. PubMed ID: 34498789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.