These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure. Nie A; Ke C; Li M; Guo B Adv Cogn Psychol; 2019; 15(4):276-289. PubMed ID: 32494313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall. Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. False memory for associated word lists in individuals and collaborating groups. Maki RH; Weigold A; Arellano A Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):598-603. PubMed ID: 18491499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition? Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Aron A Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 20234016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Simulating conversations: A Markov chain model of a central speaker's mnemonic influence over a group of communicating listeners. Sozer EE; Yamashiro JK; Hirst W Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):430-443. PubMed ID: 37792165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall. Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film. Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Group remembering: does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Weldon MS; Blair C; Huebsch PD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1568-77. PubMed ID: 11185783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Collaborative inhibition in spatial memory retrieval. Sjolund LA; Erdman M; Kelly JW Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 24622929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall. Barber SJ; Rajaram S Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 21736433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterizing adult age differences in the initiation and organization of retrieval: A further investigation of retrieval dynamics in dual-list free recall. Wahlheim CN; Richmond LL; Huff MJ; Dobbins IG Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):786-797. PubMed ID: 27831715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method. Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Garrido MV Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2548-2558. PubMed ID: 37027039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting. Nie A; Guo B Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Jun; 130(3):1040-1076. PubMed ID: 36988341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account. Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks. Blumen HM; Rajaram S Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]