142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36780366)
1. Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Hassan AM; Asaad M; Brook DS; Shah NR; Kumar SC; Liu J; Adelman DM; Clemens MW; Selber JC; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 152(4):872-881. PubMed ID: 36780366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acellular Dermal Matrix Provides Durable Long-Term Outcomes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Study of Patients with Over 60 Months of Follow-up.
Asaad M; Kapur SK; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Ann Surg; 2022 Nov; 276(5):e563-e570. PubMed ID: 33086319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Component Separation With Porcine Acellular Dermal Reinforcement to Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Repair of Significant Midline Ventral Hernia Defects.
Lightfoot RW; Thrash C; Thompson S; Richmond BK
Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 34772290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall herniorrhaphy or bridging.
Van Orden K; Santos J; Stanfield B; Frost LS; Ruditsky A; Foster A; Brahmbhatt TS; Burke PA; Fernandez-Moure J; Haines K; Agarwal S; Kasotakis G
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Jun; 48(3):1993-2001. PubMed ID: 33712893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.
Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis.
Mericli AF; Garvey PB; Giordano S; Liu J; Baumann DP; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Mar; 224(3):351-361.e2. PubMed ID: 27965133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Maxwell DW; Hart AM; Keifer OP; Halani SH; Losken A
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 82(4):435-440. PubMed ID: 30562207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurrent intestinal fistulation after porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement in enteric fistula takedown and simultaneous abdominal wall reconstruction.
Kalaiselvan R; Carlson GL; Hayes S; Lees NP; Anderson ID; Slade DAJ
Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):537-543. PubMed ID: 31811593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Booth JH; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Selber JC; Nguyen AT; Clemens MW; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24083910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.
Giordano S; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Surgery; 2017 Feb; 161(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 27810091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Gatti M; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 22156887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Garvey PB; Giordano SA; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Mar; 224(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 27993696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital readmission following open, single-stage, elective abdominal wall reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix affects long-term hernia recurrence rate.
Giordano SA; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Am J Surg; 2018 Jul; 216(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 29458969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Component Separation Decreases Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh.
Giordano S; Garvey PB; Mericli A; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar; 153(3):717-726. PubMed ID: 37285202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate, Multistaged Approach to Infected Synthetic Mesh: Outcomes After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Albino FP; Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Attinger CE; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 75(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 24667884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced age does not affect abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes using acellular dermal matrix: A comparative study using propensity score analysis.
Giordano S; Schaverien M; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Am J Surg; 2017 Jun; 213(6):1046-1052. PubMed ID: 27939763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
Clemens MW; Selber JC; Liu J; Adelman DM; Baumann DP; Garvey PB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 22965235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center.
Hassan AM; Franco CM; Shah NR; Netherton TJ; Mericli AF; Garvey PP; Schaverien MV; Chang EI; Hanasono MM; Selber JC; Butler CE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):3712-3720. PubMed ID: 36662331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Albino F; Bhanot P
Am J Surg; 2013 Feb; 205(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 23195145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.
Garvey PB; Martinez RA; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64. PubMed ID: 25440025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
