These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36785976)

  • 1. An ecologist's introduction to continuous-time multi-state models for capture-recapture data.
    Rushing CS
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Apr; 92(4):936-944. PubMed ID: 36785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for fitting hidden Markov models to multi-state capture-recapture data of invasive carp in the Illinois River.
    Labuzzetta CJ; Coulter AA; Erickson RA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 38191559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Continuous-Time Spatial Capture-Recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns.
    Distiller GB; Borchers DL; Foster RJ; Harmsen BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):e6822. PubMed ID: 33145005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of spatial capture-recapture: Ecological insights, limitations, and prospects.
    Tourani M
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e8468. PubMed ID: 35127014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using imputation and mixture model approaches to integrate multi-state capture-recapture models with assignment information.
    Wen Z; Pollock KH; Nichols JD; Waser PM; Cao W
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 24571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling.
    Lukacs PM; Burnham KP
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):3909-19. PubMed ID: 16262847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling abundance, distribution, movement and space use with camera and telemetry data.
    Chandler RB; Crawford DA; Garrison EP; Miller KV; Cherry MJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3583. PubMed ID: 34767254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A field ecologist's adventures in the virtual world: using simulations to design data collection for complex models.
    Thomas FM; Vesk PA; Hauser CE
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Dec; 28(8):2130-2141. PubMed ID: 30276923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A continuous time version and a generalization of a Markov-recapture model for trapping experiments.
    Alpizar-Jara R; Smith CE
    Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 18556026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of Bayesian state-space modelling of capture-recapture-recovery data.
    King R
    Interface Focus; 2012 Apr; 2(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 23565333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications.
    Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient spatial multi-state capture-recapture model to study natal dispersal: An application to the Alpine marmot.
    Dupont P; Allainé D; Ferrandiz-Rovira M; Pradel R
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jan; 91(1):266-278. PubMed ID: 34743354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Movement-assisted localization from acoustic telemetry data.
    Hostetter NJ; Royle JA
    Mov Ecol; 2020; 8():15. PubMed ID: 32617163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science.
    Banks-Leite C; Pardini R; Boscolo D; Cassano CR; Püttker T; Barros CS; Barlow J
    J Appl Ecol; 2014 Aug; 51(4):849-859. PubMed ID: 25177046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches.
    Efford MG
    Ecology; 2011 Dec; 92(12):2202-7. PubMed ID: 22352159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.