152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36786323)
1. When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information.
Chromý J; Vojvodić S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):111-132. PubMed ID: 36786323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.
Hubbard RJ; Federmeier KD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 36(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 37902591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.
Chung YMW; Federmeier KD
Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1511-1526. PubMed ID: 37458967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phonological information in immediate and delayed sentence recall.
Rummer R; Engelkamp J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 12587896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alignment of alpha-band desynchronization with syntactic structure predicts successful sentence comprehension.
Vassileiou B; Meyer L; Beese C; Friederici AD
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():286-296. PubMed ID: 29627592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of sentence focus on motor system activity in language comprehension and its temporal dynamics: Preliminary evidence from sEMG.
Zhou G; Wang X; Xu Z; Jin H
Biol Psychol; 2024 Feb; 186():108755. PubMed ID: 38266868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
Heyselaar E; Segaert K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A role for left inferior frontal and posterior superior temporal cortex in extracting a syntactic tree from a sentence.
Pattamadilok C; Dehaene S; Pallier C
Cortex; 2016 Feb; 75():44-55. PubMed ID: 26709465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemispheric differences in the activation of perceptual information during sentence comprehension.
Lincoln AE; Long DL; Baynes K
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 16893556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences in children's comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating.
Karlsson J; Jolles D; Koornneef A; van den Broek P; Van Leijenhorst L
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():1-18. PubMed ID: 31077975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic effects in sentence recall: the contribution of immediate vs delayed recall in language assessment.
Polišenská K; Chiat S; Comer A; McKenzie K
J Commun Disord; 2014; 52():65-77. PubMed ID: 25260496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension.
Wang R; Mo L; He X; Smythe I; Wang S
Int J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 22044009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension.
Key-DeLyria SE; Bodner T; Altmann LJP
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):665-682. PubMed ID: 30612265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.
Payne BR; Grison S; Gao X; Christianson K; Morrow DG; Stine-Morrow EA
Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24291806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
Krause CD; Fengler A; Pino D; Sehm B; Friederici AD; Obrig H
Neuropsychologia; 2023 Feb; 180():108465. PubMed ID: 36586718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond sentence boundaries: grammatical gender information in short-term recall of texts.
Schweppe J; Rummer R; Fürstenberg A
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19103977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.
Carlson K; Dickey MW; Frazier L; Clifton C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39. PubMed ID: 18609404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
