These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3678649)

  • 1. Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.
    Popelka GR; Mason DI
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. PubMed ID: 3678649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Ching TY; Dillon H; Katsch R; Byrne D
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 11409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Schmitt N; Winkler A; Boretzki M; Holube I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):367-379. PubMed ID: 27179256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech.
    Asp F; Jakobsson AM; Berninger E
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():54-63. PubMed ID: 29190488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical ear canal probe tube measurements.
    Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):74S-81S. PubMed ID: 3678654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P; Oleson J; Van Buren J; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):24S-37S. PubMed ID: 26731156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic free-field headphone as hearing aid transducer. A preliminary report.
    Nielsen KO; Nielsen SS; Nielsen HB
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 3749778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe tube microphone measures of loudness discomfort levels in children.
    Stuart A; Durieux-Smith A; Stenstrom R
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 2065839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1112-32. PubMed ID: 12243159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right-Ear Advantage for Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults.
    Behtani L; Fuente A; Ianiszewski A; Osman RA
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Mar; 17(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 33893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.