These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36786560)

  • 1. Determination of Sessile Drop Wetting Angle Based on μCT without the Direct Angle Measurement.
    Kadyrov R; Mukhamatdinov I; Statsenko E
    Langmuir; 2023 Feb; 39(8):2966-2973. PubMed ID: 36786560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition.
    Starov VM
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Nov; 111(1-2):3-27. PubMed ID: 15571660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Camera Parallax Angle on the Accuracy of Static Contact Angle Measurements.
    Johnson OM; Mangolini F
    Langmuir; 2024 Mar; 40(10):5090-5097. PubMed ID: 38407033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements.
    Huhtamäki T; Tian X; Korhonen JT; Ras RHA
    Nat Protoc; 2018 Jul; 13(7):1521-1538. PubMed ID: 29988109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contact angles of liquid drops on super hydrophobic surfaces: understanding the role of flattening of drops by gravity.
    Extrand CW; Moon SI
    Langmuir; 2010 Nov; 26(22):17090-9. PubMed ID: 20964303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the accuracy of contact angle measurements for sessile drops on liquid-repellent surfaces.
    Srinivasan S; McKinley GH; Cohen RE
    Langmuir; 2011 Nov; 27(22):13582-9. PubMed ID: 21923173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solid-liquid-liquid wettability and its prediction with surface free energy models.
    Stammitti-Scarpone A; Acosta EJ
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2019 Feb; 264():28-46. PubMed ID: 30396508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method for measuring the superhydrophobic contact angle with high accuracy.
    Hung YL; Chang YY; Wang MJ; Lin SY
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Jun; 81(6):065105. PubMed ID: 20590267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the equilibrium contact angle of sessile liquid drops from molecular dynamics simulations.
    Ravipati S; Aymard B; Kalliadasis S; Galindo A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Apr; 148(16):164704. PubMed ID: 29716213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spreading of liquid drops over porous substrates.
    Starov VM; Zhdanov SA; Kosvintsev SR; Sobolev VD; Velarde MG
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2003 Jul; 104():123-58. PubMed ID: 12818493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wetting and adhesion evaluation of cosmetic ingredients and products: correlation of in vitro-in vivo contact angle measurements.
    Capra P; Musitelli G; Perugini P
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Aug; 39(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 28067963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detailed statistical contact angle analyses; "slow moving" drops on inclining silicon-oxide surfaces.
    Schmitt M; Groß K; Grub J; Heib F
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2015 Jun; 447():229-39. PubMed ID: 25465200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A robust polynomial fitting approach for contact angle measurements.
    Atefi E; Mann JA; Tavana H
    Langmuir; 2013 May; 29(19):5677-88. PubMed ID: 23570502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of dynamic wetting pressure on contact angle measurements.
    Ahmed A; Sanedrin R; Willers T; Waghmare PR
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2022 Feb; 608(Pt 1):1086-1093. PubMed ID: 34785456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray computed microtomography for drop shape analysis and contact angle measurement.
    Santini M; Guilizzoni M; Fest-Santini S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2013 Nov; 409():204-10. PubMed ID: 23859817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement errors related to contact angle analysis of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Read ML; Morgan PB; Maldonado-Codina C
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Nov; 91(2):662-668. PubMed ID: 19582861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Through-Drop Imaging of Liquid-Solid Interfaces: From Contact Angle Variations Along the Droplet Perimeter to Mapping of Contact Angles Across a Surface.
    Vieira A; Jokinen V; Lepikko S; Ras RHA; Zhou Q
    Langmuir; 2024 Apr; 40(17):9059-9067. PubMed ID: 38621291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous measurement of contact angle and surface tension using axisymmetric drop-shape analysis-no apex (ADSA-NA).
    Kalantarian A; David R; Chen J; Neumann AW
    Langmuir; 2011 Apr; 27(7):3485-95. PubMed ID: 21355566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.