These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36787974)

  • 1. High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Mukerji A; Rempel E; Thabane L; Johnson H; Schmolzer G; Law BHY; Jani P; Tracy M; Rottkamp C; Keszler M; Kirpalani H; Shah PS;
    BMJ Open; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e069024. PubMed ID: 36787974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.
    Zhou R; Xiong T; Tang J; Huang Y; Liu W; Zhu J; Chen C; Gong L; Tian K; Wang A; Mu D
    Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 37803402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Qi H; Feng Z; Shi Y; De Luca D;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 176(6):551-559. PubMed ID: 35467744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Li F; Shi Y; Feng Z; De Luca D;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2321644. PubMed ID: 37399009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled, superiority trial.
    Li Y; Zhu X; Shi Y;
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e068450. PubMed ID: 36868587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD003212. PubMed ID: 25188554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Zhu XW; Shi Y; Shi LP; Liu L; Xue J; Ramanathan R;
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 29898763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol.
    Roberts CT; Owen LS; Manley BJ; Donath SM; Davis PG
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e008483. PubMed ID: 26109120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Ramanathan R; Sekar KC; Rasmussen M; Bhatia J; Soll RF
    J Perinatol; 2012 May; 32(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 22301528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants.
    Kidman AM; Manley BJ; Boland RA; Malhotra A; Donath SM; Davis PG; Bhatia R
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jun; 11(6):e045897. PubMed ID: 34162644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Davis PG; Lemyre B; de Paoli AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003212. PubMed ID: 11687052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.
    Oncel MY; Arayici S; Uras N; Alyamac-Dizdar E; Sari FN; Karahan S; Canpolat FE; Oguz SS; Dilmen U
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2016 Jul; 101(4):F323-8. PubMed ID: 26553376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
    Kidman AM; Manley BJ; Boland RA; Malhotra A; Donath SM; Beker F; Davis PG; Bhatia R
    Lancet Child Adolesc Health; 2023 Dec; 7(12):844-851. PubMed ID: 38240784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Malakian A; Bashirnezhadkhabaz S; Aramesh MR; Dehdashtian M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2601-2607. PubMed ID: 30513030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
    Dursun M; Uslu S; Bulbul A; Celik M; Zubarioglu U; Bas EK
    J Trop Pediatr; 2019 Aug; 65(4):352-360. PubMed ID: 30239857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD002272. PubMed ID: 10908544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal CPAP after Extubation of VLBW Infants.
    Estay AS; Mariani GL; Alvarez CA; Milet B; Agost D; Avila CP; Roldan L; Abdala DA; Keller R; Galletti MF; González A;
    Neonatology; 2020; 117(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 32388511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.
    De Paoli AG; Davis PG; Faber B; Morley CJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; 2008(1):CD002977. PubMed ID: 18254011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study on application of Duo positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome].
    Kong LK; Kong XY; Li LH; Dong JY; Shang MX; Chi JH; Huang RX; Zheng Y; Ma JE; Chen XC; Wang Y; Cai N; Feng ZC
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 14(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 23234771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial.
    Baldan E; Varal IG; Dogan P; Cizmeci MN
    Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Oct; 182(10):4499-4507. PubMed ID: 37491619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.