212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36788064)
1. Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study.
Baez-Navarro X; van Bockstal MR; Nawawi D; Broeckx G; Colpaert C; Doebar SC; Hogenes MCH; Koop E; Lambein K; Peeters DJE; Sinke RHJA; Bastiaan van Brakel J; van der Starre-Gaal J; van der Vegt B; van de Vijver K; Vreuls CPH; Vreuls W; Westenend PJ; van Deurzen CHM
Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100009. PubMed ID: 36788064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the 2017 ASCO/CAP guideline for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma surgical specimen to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline for breast cancer in assessing the HER2 status in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
Chao WR; Lee MY; Lee YJ; Sheu GT; Han CP
Virchows Arch; 2022 May; 480(5):1023-1030. PubMed ID: 35226147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category.
Pasricha S; Gupta G; Garg R; Sharma A; Gandhi JS; Durga G; Kamboj M; Grover S; Mehta A
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
Mohanlal RD; Bouwer N; Willem P
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Sep; 31(8):555-560. PubMed ID: 37471623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histologic analysis according to HER2 gene status in HER2 2 + invasive breast cancer: a study of 280 cases comparing ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guideline recommendations.
Hwang HW; Hong SA; Nam SJ; Kim SW; Lee JE; Yu JH; Lee SK; Cho SY; Cho EY
Virchows Arch; 2022 Apr; 480(4):749-758. PubMed ID: 35138452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
