129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36788211)
1. Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.
Kudo T; Kanaji S; Harada H; Ohmura Y; Sawada R; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Kakeji Y
Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 36788211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-based laparoscopic camera steering versus conventional steering: a comparison study.
Wijsman PJM; Molenaar L; Voskens FJ; Van't Hullenaar CDP; Broeders IAMJ
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 35059956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a joystick-guided robotic scope holder (Soloassist II®): retrospective comparative study with human assistant.
Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Jun; 404(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 31129765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder.
Merola S; Weber P; Wasielewski A; Ballantyne GH
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12008762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Robotic Camera Holder Controlled by Head Movements: Exploring This New Robot-Surgeon Interface.
Bucher JN; Bruewer K; Dietz LJ; Trebesius N; Hidding J; Wysocki M; Schoenberg MB; Werner J; Karcz K
Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 32406783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Wijsman PJM; Voskens FJ; Molenaar L; van 't Hullenaar CDP; Consten ECJ; Draaisma WA; Broeders IAMJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2334-2340. PubMed ID: 33977377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method to objectively assess robotic assistance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Ngu JC; Teo NZ
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2251. PubMed ID: 33686793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery.
Ohmura Y; Nakagawa M; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Visc Med; 2018 Feb; 34(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 29594168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wan GY; Zhou XY; Duan HX; Zou ZY; Zhang MM; Mao JB
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2023 Aug; 32(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 37051809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.
Maheshwari M; Ind T
J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 26531201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Fritz M; Djalali P; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2014 Nov; 25():19-23. PubMed ID: 25419950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate of skill acquisition in the use of a robotic laparoscope holder (FreeHand(®)).
Sbaih M; Arulampalam TH; Motson RW
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2016 Aug; 25(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 27270102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections.
Stott MC; Barrie J; Sebastien D; Hammill C; Subar DA
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 28727633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a robotic camera holder (FreeHand
Mittal R; Sbaih M; Motson RW; Arulampalam T
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2020 Feb; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30789101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy.
Rade M; Birkett D; Sherman J; Nepomnayshy D
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Mar; 31(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 32852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with a palm-controlled laparoscope holder.
Polet R; Donnez J
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Feb; 11(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 15104836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design and preliminary in vivo validation of a robotic laparoscope holder for minimally invasive surgery.
Herman B; Dehez B; Duy KT; Raucent B; Dombre E; Krut S
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19455594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
