These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36788381)

  • 1. New Phylogenetic Markov Models for Inapplicable Morphological Characters.
    Tarasov S
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):681-693. PubMed ID: 36788381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.
    Simões TR; Vernygora OV; de Medeiros BAS; Wright AM
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):662-680. PubMed ID: 36773019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reconsideration of inapplicable characters, and an approximation with step-matrix recoding.
    Goloboff PA; De Laet J; Ríos-Tamayo D; Szumik CA
    Cladistics; 2021 Oct; 37(5):596-629. PubMed ID: 34570932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phylogenetic Inference Using RevBayes.
    Höhna S; Landis MJ; Heath TA
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 57():6.16.1-6.16.34. PubMed ID: 28463399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stasis and convergence characterize morphological evolution in eupolypod II ferns.
    Sundue MA; Rothfels CJ
    Ann Bot; 2014 Jan; 113(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 24197753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RevBayes: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference Using Graphical Models and an Interactive Model-Specification Language.
    Höhna S; Landis MJ; Heath TA; Boussau B; Lartillot N; Moore BR; Huelsenbeck JP; Ronquist F
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):726-36. PubMed ID: 27235697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data.
    Puttick MN; O'Reilly JE; Tanner AR; Fleming JF; Clark J; Holloway L; Lozano-Fernandez J; Parry LA; Tarver JE; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 284(1846):. PubMed ID: 28077778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.
    Lewis PO
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(6):913-25. PubMed ID: 12116640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters.
    Harrison LB; Larsson HC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 25527198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Homoplasy-Based Partitioning Outperforms Alternatives in Bayesian Analysis of Discrete Morphological Data.
    Rosa BB; Melo GAR; Barbeitos MS
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):657-671. PubMed ID: 30649562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian perspective on a non-parsimonious parsimony model.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Ané C; Larget B; Ronquist F
    Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):406-19. PubMed ID: 18570035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of locally sampled characters in phylogenetic analyses of sparse supermatrices.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 May; 74():1-14. PubMed ID: 24530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Nielsen R; Bollback JP
    Syst Biol; 2003 Apr; 52(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 12746144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An algorithm for Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis with Inapplicable Data.
    Brazeau MD; Guillerme T; Smith MR
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):619-631. PubMed ID: 30535172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematics and morphological evolution within the moss family Bryaceae: a comparison between parsimony and Bayesian methods for reconstruction of ancestral character states.
    Pedersen N; Holyoak DT; Newton AE
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Jun; 43(3):891-907. PubMed ID: 17161629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Innovative Bayesian and parsimony phylogeny of dung beetles (coleoptera, scarabaeidae, scarabaeinae) enhanced by ontology-based partitioning of morphological characters.
    Tarasov S; Génier F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0116671. PubMed ID: 25781019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of tree-building methods using a morphological dataset and a well-supported Hexapoda phylogeny.
    Francisco Barbosa F; Mermudes JRM; Russo CAM
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16706. PubMed ID: 38213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which morphological characters are influential in a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis? Examples from the earliest osteichthyans.
    King B
    Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190288. PubMed ID: 31311486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An extended model for phylogenetic maximum likelihood based on discrete morphological characters.
    Spade DA
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 32078576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.