136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3678975)
1. Automated quantitative fluorescent image analysis of cervical cytology.
Smith JJ; Cowan L; Hemstreet G; Smith ML; Pippitt CH; Doggett R; McGill L
Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Nov; 28(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 3678975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand.
Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Role of cytological test for cervices to identify human papillomavirus in the screening program on serious cervical lesion].
Wang GP; Li RZ; Wu LN; Li J; Liu ZH; Wang C; Zhou YQ; Weng LM; Wu RF
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 30(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 19957634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False positive cervical cytology: an important reason for colposcopy.
Feldman MJ; Seeve CC; Srebnik E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 129(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 900175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ThinPrep Processor. Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens.
Wilbur DC; Cibas ES; Merritt S; James LP; Berger BM; Bonfiglio TA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8116577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short interval between two Pap smears: effect on the result of the second smear? A prospective randomized trial.
Kolben TM; Bergauer F; Moeckel J; Boettcher B; Thaler CJ; Kolben T; Crispin A; Dannecker C; Mahner S; Gallwas J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 295(6):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28405743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test.
Hudson E
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 12(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 3888487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep Convolution Neural Network for Malignancy Detection and Classification in Microscopic Uterine Cervix Cell Images.
P B S; Faruqi F; K S H; Kudva R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Nov; 20(11):3447-3456. PubMed ID: 31759371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of Cervical Pap Smear with Biopsy in the Lesion of Cervix.
Dhakal R; Makaju R; Sharma S; Bhandari S; Shrestha S; Bastakoti R
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2016 Jul-Sept.; 14(55):254-257. PubMed ID: 28814689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
Andersen W; Frierson H; Barber S; Tabbarah S; Taylor P; Underwood P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 3048105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
Osamura RY
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
