These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36789758)

  • 1. Effect of Vibrotactile Stimulation on Auditory Timbre Perception for Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Verma T; Aker SC; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221138390. PubMed ID: 36789758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some, but not all, cochlear implant users prefer music stimuli with congruent haptic stimulation.
    Aker SC; Faulkner KF; Innes-Brown H; Vatti M; Marozeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):3101-3117. PubMed ID: 38722101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J; Epstein M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):981-94. PubMed ID: 21060140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical encoding of timbre changes in cochlear implant users.
    Zhang F; Benson C; Cahn SJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 23231816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Luo X; Soslowsky S; Pulling KR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 30377852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implantable hearing aids and neuroprosthesison music perception.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():404590. PubMed ID: 22645422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Choi JE; Won JH; Kim CH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):800. PubMed ID: 29335454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved speech intelligibility in the presence of congruent vibrotactile speech input.
    Schulte A; Marozeau J; Ruhe A; Büchner A; Kral A; Innes-Brown H
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22657. PubMed ID: 38114599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau JP; Storey CM; Blamey PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):789-806. PubMed ID: 24224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music and lexical tone perception in Chinese adult cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22362607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.