These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36790043)

  • 1. A novel polymer-free everolimus-eluting stent with a nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide film inhibits restenosis and thrombosis in a swine coronary model.
    Hyun DY; Han X; Park DS; Kim M; Park JK; Cho KH; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Ahn Y; Jeong MH
    Cardiol J; 2023 Feb; 30(6):881-91. PubMed ID: 36790043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Polymer-free Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Mid-term Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.
    Cho KH; Jeong MH; Park DS; Kim M; Kim J; Park JK; Han X; Hyun DY; Kim MC; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Kim JH; Ahn Y
    J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(40):e259. PubMed ID: 34664799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel polymer-free drug-eluting stent coated with everolimus using nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide film deposition in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Sim DS; Jeong MH; Park DS; Kim JH; Lim KS; Bae IH; Zhehao P; Yang HY; Lee JH; Hyun DY; Hong YJ; Kim JH; Ahn Y; Kang JC
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():436-440. PubMed ID: 27505330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel polymer-free everolimus-eluting stent by nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide film deposition.
    Park DS; Bae IH; Jeong MH; Lim KS; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Lee SY; Jang EJ; Shim JW; Park JK; Lim HC; Kim HB
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Oct; 91():615-623. PubMed ID: 30033294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries.
    Sperling C; Waliszewski MW; Kherad B; Krackhardt F
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2019; 13():1753944719826335. PubMed ID: 30803407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
    Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial.
    Windecker S; Haude M; Neumann FJ; Stangl K; Witzenbichler B; Slagboom T; Sabaté M; Goicolea J; Barragan P; Cook S; Piot C; Richardt G; Merkely B; Schneider H; Bilger J; Erne P; Waksman R; Zaugg S; Jüni P; Lefèvre T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001441. PubMed ID: 25634905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year vessel healing after everolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial assessment by optical coherence tomography.
    Taniguchi Y; Otake H; Shinke T; Nakagawa M; Hariki H; Inoue T; Osue T; Hiranuma N; Nishio R; Kinutani H; Iwasaki M; Konishi A; Kuroda M; Hirata K
    J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 65(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 25082295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of early vascular reactions in biodegradable and durable polymer-based drug-eluting stents in the porcine coronary artery.
    Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nagamatsu H; Yoshikawa A; Souba J; Isobe A; Hagiwara H; Ikari Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209841. PubMed ID: 30629613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus- -eluting stent versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in the diabetic population.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Roleder M; Hawranek M; Wojakowski W; Polonski L
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 31909473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Favorable neointimal coverage in everolimus-eluting stent at 9 months after stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
    Choi HH; Kim JS; Yoon DH; Hong KS; Kim TH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 21442265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
    Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans.
    Otsuka F; Vorpahl M; Nakano M; Foerst J; Newell JB; Sakakura K; Kutys R; Ladich E; Finn AV; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
    Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 24163064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First-in-man randomised comparison of the Angiolite durable fluoroacrylate polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable fluoropolymer-based everolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: the ANGIOLITE trial.
    Moreu J; Moreno-Gómez R; Pérez de Prado A; García Del Blanco B; Trillo R; Pinar E; Molina E; Zueco J; Merchán A; Díaz-Fernández JF; Amat I
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Dec; 15(12):e1081-e1089. PubMed ID: 31310239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Novel Polymer-Free Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Dioxide Film-Coated Coronary Stent Loaded With Mycophenolic Acid.
    Shim JW; Kim SS; Kim HK; Bae IH; Park DS; Park JK; Kim JU; Kim HB; Lee MY; Kim JS; Kim JH; Koo BS; Jeong KJ; Kim SU; Kim MC; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Ahn Y; Lim KS; Jeong MH
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():650408. PubMed ID: 34778222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.