These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36790043)

  • 21. A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.
    Gao RL; Xu B; Lansky AJ; Yang YJ; Ma CS; Han YL; Chen SL; Li H; Zhang RY; Fu GS; Yuan ZY; Jiang H; Huo Y; Li W; Zhang YJ; Leon MB;
    EuroIntervention; 2013 May; 9(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23685298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early Vascular Healing Following Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Placement Compared to That with Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Ogura K; Tsujita H; Oishi Y; Matsumoto H; Matsukawa N; Sakai R; Arai T; Sato S; Tanaka H; Masaki R; Arai K; Nomura K; Kosaki R; Sakai K; Sekimoto T; Kondo S; Tsukamoto S; Mori H; Yamamoto MH; Wakabayashi K; Suzuki H; Ochiai M; Shinke T
    Int Heart J; 2021 May; 62(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 33994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
    Oda T; Okamura T; Yamada J; Miyagi N; Uehara H; Nao T; Tateishi H; Maeda T; Nakamura T; Shiraishi K; Nakashima T; Nishimura S; Miura T; Matsuzaki M; Yano M
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 25614415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term clinical outcomes after everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation: final 3-year follow-up of the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Abe M; Suwa S; Muramatsu T; Kobayashi M; Dai K; Nakao K; Uematsu M; Tarutani Y; Fujii K; Simonton CA; Kimura T;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 24803436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.
    Koppara T; Tada T; Xhepa E; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Joner M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 258():42-49. PubMed ID: 29544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety and efficacy of limus-eluting stents and balloon angioplasty for sirolimus-eluting in-stent restenosis.
    Ota H; Mahmoudi M; Kitabata H; Torguson R; Chen F; Satler LF; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 25870152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 36137689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
    Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The RESERVOIR Clinical Trial.
    Romaguera R; Gómez-Hospital JA; Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Pinar E; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Gracida M; Roura G; Ferreiro JL; Teruel L; Montanya E; Fernandez-Ortiz A; Alfonso F; Valgimigli M; Sabate M; Cequier A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 9(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 26762910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
    Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of neointimal coverage between titanium-nitric oxide-coated and everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes.
    Sia J; Nammas W; Collet C; De Bruyne B; Karjalainen PP
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Mar; 76(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 35752571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Kawamura M; Sumiyoshi T; Ino Y; Morino Y; Tanabe K; Kadota K; Kimura T;
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Sep; 11(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 26390517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET).
    Kimura T; Morimoto T; Natsuaki M; Shiomi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Takatsu Y; Nishikawa H; Yamamoto Y; Nakagawa Y; Hayashi Y; Iwabuchi M; Umeda H; Kawai K; Okada H; Kimura K; Simonton CA; Kozuma K;
    Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(10):1225-36. PubMed ID: 22824435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with small coronary arteries (≤2.5 mm): outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up.
    Yano H; Horinaka S; Ishikawa M; Ishimitsu T
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Jul; 32(7):796-803. PubMed ID: 28025695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.
    Bangalore S; Kumar S; Fusaro M; Amoroso N; Attubato MJ; Feit F; Bhatt DL; Slater J
    Circulation; 2012 Jun; 125(23):2873-91. PubMed ID: 22586281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.