123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36791345)
61. Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.
Feldman D; Kruger P; Delbecque L; Duenas A; Bernard-Poenaru O; Wollenschneider S; Hicks N; Reed JA; Sargeant I; Pakarinen C; Hamoir AM; ; ;
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Aug; 7(1):57. PubMed ID: 34425911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.
Duffy JMN; Adamson GD; Benson E; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya S; Bofill M; Brian K; Collura B; Curtis C; Evers JLH; Farquharson RG; Fincham A; Franik S; Giudice LC; Glanville E; Hickey M; Horne AW; Hull ML; Johnson NP; Jordan V; Khalaf Y; Knijnenburg JML; Legro RS; Lensen S; MacKenzie J; Mavrelos D; Mol BW; Morbeck DE; Nagels H; Ng EHY; Niederberger C; Otter AS; Puscasiu L; Rautakallio-Hokkanen S; Sadler L; Sarris I; Showell M; Stewart J; Strandell A; Strawbridge C; Vail A; van Wely M; Vercoe M; Vuong NL; Wang AY; Wang R; Wilkinson J; Wong K; Wong TY; Farquhar CM;
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jan; 115(1):180-190. PubMed ID: 33272617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Laying the foundations of community engagement in Aboriginal health research: establishing a community reference group and terms of reference in a novel research field.
O'Brien P; Prehn R; Rind N; Lin I; Choong PFM; Bessarab D; Coffin J; Mason T; Dowsey MM; Bunzli S
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Aug; 8(1):40. PubMed ID: 35927687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.
Jessani NS; Siddiqi SM; Babcock C; Davey-Rothwell M; Ho S; Holtgrave DR
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 30045730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Engaging populations underrepresented in research through novel approaches to consent.
Kraft SA; Doerr M
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2018 Mar; 178(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 29512940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.
Doerr M; Maguire Truong A; Bot BM; Wilbanks J; Suver C; Mangravite LM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Patient engagement works: Patient and researcher experiences of patient partnership in primary healthcare research.
Howse D; Delahunty-Pike A; Dumont-Samson O; Bisson M; Lambert M; Doucet S; Chouinard MC; Hudon C; Scott C; Burge F; Wilhelm L; Warren M; Porter J; Schwarz C; Rubenstein D; Gaudreau A
Ann Fam Med; 2022 Apr; 20(Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 38270736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Participant engagement in a community based participatory research study to reduce alcohol use among Latino immigrant men.
Torres VN; Williams EC; Ceballos RM; Donovan DM; Duran B; Ornelas IJ
Health Educ Res; 2020 Dec; 35(6):627-636. PubMed ID: 33025021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study.
MacNeil M; Abelson J; Moore C; Lindsay S; Adams J; Alshaikhahmed A; Jain K; Petrie P; Ganann R
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Dec; 9(1):116. PubMed ID: 38062536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review.
Fergusson D; Monfaredi Z; Pussegoda K; Garritty C; Lyddiatt A; Shea B; Duffett L; Ghannad M; Montroy J; Murad MH; Pratt M; Rader T; Shorr R; Yazdi F
Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():17. PubMed ID: 29796308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Engaging participants with research findings: A rights-informed approach.
George MS; Gaitonde R; Davey R; Mohanty I; Upton P
Health Expect; 2023 Apr; 26(2):765-773. PubMed ID: 36647684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Exploring Online Crowdfunding for Cancer-Related Costs Among LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus) Cancer Survivors: Integration of Community-Engaged and Technology-Based Methodologies.
Waters AR; Turner C; Easterly CW; Tovar I; Mulvaney M; Poquadeck M; Johnston H; Ghazal LV; Rains SA; Cloyes KG; Kirchhoff AC; Warner EL
JMIR Cancer; 2023 Oct; 9():e51605. PubMed ID: 37902829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Move the north: evaluation of a regional stakeholder engagement initiative to support the development of a community-partnered physical activity research agenda.
Pelletier C; Pousette A; Fox G; Keahey R; Ward K; Faulkner G; Rasali D; Allison S
Res Involv Engagem; 2019; 5():37. PubMed ID: 31798963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A digital health research platform for community engagement, recruitment, and retention of sexual and gender minority adults in a national longitudinal cohort study--The PRIDE Study.
Lunn MR; Lubensky M; Hunt C; Flentje A; Capriotti MR; Sooksaman C; Harnett T; Currie D; Neal C; Obedin-Maliver J
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Aug; 26(8-9):737-748. PubMed ID: 31162545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Organizational capacity for patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: interviews with patient/family advisors, managers and clinicians.
Anderson NN; Baker GR; Moody L; Scane K; Urquhart R; Wodchis WP; Gagliardi AR
Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Nov; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 34718601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.
Parry M; Bjørnnes AK; Toupin-April K; Najam A; Wells D; Sivakumar A; Richards DP; Ceroni T; Park M; Ellis AK; Gilron I; Marlin S
Patient; 2020 Dec; 13(6):745-756. PubMed ID: 33026639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Co-creation of a patient engagement strategy in cancer research funding.
Taccone MS; Baudais N; Wood D; Bays S; Frost S; Urquhart R; Graham ID; Takacs J
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Sep; 9(1):86. PubMed ID: 37775825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Getting our priorities straight: a novel framework for stakeholder-informed prioritization of cancer genomics research.
Esmail LC; Roth J; Rangarao S; Carlson JJ; Thariani R; Ramsey SD; Veenstra DL; Deverka P
Genet Med; 2013 Feb; 15(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 23037935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.
Manalili K; Siad FM; Antonio M; Lashewicz B; Santana MJ
Health Expect; 2022 Oct; 25(5):2188-2202. PubMed ID: 34854190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Represent: A community engagement roadmap to improve participant representation in cancer early detection research: An Oregon case study.
Currier J; Arteaga I; Turner-Uaandja H; Starling B; Pashayan N; Jäderholm C; Ponce Campuzano C; Shannon J
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1110543. PubMed ID: 36935656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
