These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36791889)

  • 1. Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Pitz-Gonçalves LI; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S124-S130. PubMed ID: 36791889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No Difference in Dislocation Rates Comparing Large Diameter Jumbo Femoral Heads and Dual-Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Sonn KA; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3716-3721. PubMed ID: 34391597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads.
    Beckert M; Meneghini RM; Meding JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S571-S576. PubMed ID: 35271976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
    Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).
    Huten D; Fournier Y; Gicquel T; Bertho P; Basselot F; Hamadouche M
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31153859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
    Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis.
    Bouchet R; Mercier N; Saragaglia D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Feb; 97(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 21177149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Haughom BD; Plummer DR; Moric M; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 26360768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
    Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Weintraub MT; DeBenedetti A; Nam D; Darrith B; Baker CM; Waren D; Schwarzkopf R; Courtney PM; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S206-S210. PubMed ID: 37019309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pairing 40-mm Femoral Heads With the Smallest Compatible Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Outcomes in 177 Cases.
    Bukowski BR; Baker CE; Abdel MP; Trousdale RT
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S582-S587. PubMed ID: 35256235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Stoney J; Graves SE; Bingham R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Aug; 104(16):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 35703140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements.
    Addona JL; Gu A; De Martino I; Malahias MA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2793-2798. PubMed ID: 31402075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.
    Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociation and Intrapelvic Entrapment of a Dual-mobility Polyethylene Component.
    Fehring KA; Berry DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1072-6. PubMed ID: 26088765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-mobility constructs versus large femoral head bearings in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Hoskins W; McDonald L; Claireaux H; Bingham R; Griffin X
    Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):685-696. PubMed ID: 35438011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.