240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36792205)
1. Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Tsujita Y; Sofue K; Ueshima E; Ueno Y; Hori M; Tsurusaki M; Murakami T
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2023 Apr; 22(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 36792205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of HCC response to locoregional therapy: Validation of MRI-based response criteria versus explant pathology.
Gordic S; Corcuera-Solano I; Stueck A; Besa C; Argiriadi P; Guniganti P; King M; Kihira S; Babb J; Thung S; Taouli B
J Hepatol; 2017 Dec; 67(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 28823713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. mRECIST and EASL responses at early time point by contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI predict survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by doxorubicin drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB TACE).
Prajapati HJ; Spivey JR; Hanish SI; El-Rayes BF; Kauh JS; Chen Z; Kim HS
Ann Oncol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):965-73. PubMed ID: 23223331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.
Kim SW; Joo I; Kim HC; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Lee JM
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 32006170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal imaging criteria and modality to determine Milan criteria for the prediction of post-transplant HCC recurrence after locoregional treatment.
Seo N; Joo DJ; Park MS; Kim SS; Shin HJ; Chung YE; Choi JY; Kim MS; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):501-511. PubMed ID: 35821427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are superior to European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria at 1 month follow-up for predicting long-term survival in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer.
Shuster A; Huynh TJ; Rajan DK; Marquez MA; Grant DR; Huynh DC; Jaskolka JD
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):805-12. PubMed ID: 23562641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal measurement modality and method for evaluation of responses to transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma based on enhancement criteria.
Shim JH; Han S; Shin YM; Yu E; Park W; Kim KM; Lim YS; Lee HC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 23312990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response.
Abdelrahman AS; Ekladious MEY; Badran EM; Madkour SS
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022 Nov; 103(11):524-534. PubMed ID: 35787988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which Criteria Applied in Multi-Phasic CT Can Predict Early Tumor Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated Using Conventional TACE: RECIST, mRECIST, EASL or qEASL?
Zhao Y; Duran R; Bai W; Sahu S; Wang W; Kabus S; Lin M; Han G; Geschwind JF
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):433-442. PubMed ID: 29086058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT imaging findings in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Alternative response criteria (Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (mRECIST)) versus RECIST 1.1.
Gavanier M; Ayav A; Sellal C; Orry X; Claudon M; Bronowicki JP; Laurent V
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 26724654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Response After Locoregional Therapy.
Kampalath R; Tran-Harding K; Do RKG; Mendiratta-Lala M; Yaghmai V
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2021 Aug; 29(3):389-403. PubMed ID: 34243925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic response to transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kim CJ; Kim HJ; Park JH; Park DI; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI; Kim MJ
Liver Int; 2014 Feb; 34(2):305-12. PubMed ID: 23890360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1 and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIVROSG-0602.
Sato Y; Watanabe H; Sone M; Onaya H; Sakamoto N; Osuga K; Takahashi M; Arai Y;
Ups J Med Sci; 2013 Mar; 118(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23167460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The true role of mRECIST guideline: does it really estimate viable tumor or merely improve accuracy in hepatocellular carcinoma response evaluation?
Liu Q; Li A; Sun S; Luo R; Chen F
J BUON; 2014; 19(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 24965398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of response after initial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it predict failure of subsequent treatment?
Georgiades C; Geschwind JF; Harrison N; Hines-Peralta A; Liapi E; Hong K; Wu Z; Kamel I; Frangakis C
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 22891361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma after trans-arterial chemoembolization.
Kierans AS; Najjar M; Dutruel SP; Gavlin A; Chen C; Lee MJ; Askin G; Halazun KJ
Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():117-122. PubMed ID: 34303189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
