These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36794108)

  • 1. The Effects of Different Agitation Techniques of Canal Irrigant on Tubular Penetration of a Bioceramic Sealer.
    Zand V; Salem Milani A; Yavari HR; Majidi AR
    Iran Endod J; 2019; 14(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 36794108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of different activation procedures on sodium hypochlorite penetration into dentinal tubules after endodontic retreatment via confocal laser scanning microscopy.
    Gunes B; Yeter KY; Altay Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1103. PubMed ID: 39289653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher, Endoactivator, and PUI agitation in the penetration of intracanal medicaments into dentinal tubules: A confocal laser scanning microscope analysis.
    Akkol E; Özlek E
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2024; 18(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 39386126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.
    Akcay M; Arslan H; Durmus N; Mese M; Capar ID
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 26774730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Different Agitation Techniques on the Penetration of Irrigant and Sealer into Dentinal Tubules.
    Gu Y; Perinpanayagam H; Kum DJ; Yoo YJ; Jeong JS; Lim SM; Chang SW; Baek SH; Zhu Q; Kum KY
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Feb; 35(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 27929924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different irrigation regimens on the dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer: a confocal analysis study.
    Ateş AA; Arıcan B; Çiftçioğlu E; Küçükay ES
    Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(8):1771-1777. PubMed ID: 34148161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dentinal Tubules after Conventional Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Agitation and Nd:YAG Laser Activated Irrigation.
    Ghorbanzadeh A; Aminsobhani M; Sohrabi K; Chiniforush N; Ghafari S; Shamshiri AR; Noroozi N
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2016; 7(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 27330706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study.
    Bao P; Liu H; Yang L; Zhang L; Yang L; Xiao N; Shen J; Deng J; Shen Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):261. PubMed ID: 38389109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the efficacy of three different supplementary cleaning protocols in root-filled teeth with a bioceramic sealer after retreatment-a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Sinsareekul C; Hiran-Us S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3515-3521. PubMed ID: 34854988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.
    Cai M; Cai Y; Yang R; Xu Z; Neelakantan P; Wei X
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):201. PubMed ID: 35606751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Various Laser-Activated Irrigation Protocols on Endodontic Sealer Penetration into the Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.
    Cheng X; Wang X; Liu N; Guan Q; Yu Q; He W
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Aug; 39(8):544-549. PubMed ID: 34339326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Nd:YAG laser on the penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer into dentinal tubules: A confocal analysis.
    Jardim Del Monaco R; Tavares de Oliveira M; de Lima AF; Scarparo Navarro R; Zanetti RV; de Fátima Teixeira da Silva D; Horliana ACRT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202295. PubMed ID: 30133509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of penetration of sealers in dentinal tubules using passive ultrasonic irrigation and Erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser - A confocal laser scanning microscope study.
    Talreja T; Tandale A; Kunkulol R; Maniyar V; Krishnakumar K; Dube R; Kokate P
    J Conserv Dent Endod; 2023; 26(6):634-638. PubMed ID: 38292741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleaning Efficiency of XP Finisher, XP Finisher R and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Following Retreatment of Teeth Obturated with TotalFill HiFlow Bioceramic Sealer.
    Hassan R; Elzahar S
    Eur Endod J; 2022 Jun; 7(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 35786578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different irrigation activation methods on the penetration of the irrigation solution into the dentinal tubules in teeth with calcium hydroxide applied and oval-shaped canals: Confocal laser scanning microscope analysis.
    Er Karaoğlu G; Aydın ZU
    Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Sep; 87(9):2194-2203. PubMed ID: 38716871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of canal patency and cleanliness following retreatment of bioceramic sealer-obturated root canals using three different irrigant activation protocols.
    Lyngdoh D; Alam S; Iftekhar H; Mishra SK
    Aust Endod J; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38745548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.
    Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W
    J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of different irrigation techniques on the penetration depth of different sealers into dentinal tubules by confocal laser scanning microscope: An
    Kachari M; Adarsha MS; Meena N; Kumari A; Sudhanva ME; Vijayalakshmi L
    J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Apr; 27(4):388-392. PubMed ID: 38779208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation.
    Özlek E; Neelakantan P; Akkol E; Gündüz H; Uçar AY; Belli S
    Eur Endod J; 2020 Dec; 5(3):264-270. PubMed ID: 33353924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.