170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36794406)
1. Physicians Controlling Women's Reproductive Choices: The Slow Liberalization of Abortion Laws in Finland.
Takala T; Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 36794406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's reproductive health.
Rosenfield A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 169(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 8333437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynaecologists' attitudes to abortion.
Savage W; Francome C
Lancet; 1989 Dec; 2(8675):1323-4. PubMed ID: 2574266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The abortion battle: the Canadian scene.
Sachdev P
Med Law; 1994; 13(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 8065237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducing inequalities: abortion policy and practice in Thailand.
Whittaker A
Women Health; 2002; 35(4):101-19. PubMed ID: 12216989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Charo RA
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law.
Nowicka W
Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.
Cook RJ
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and women's rights in Poland, 1994.
David HP; Titkow A
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 7985218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The history of abortion-related acts and current issues in Japan.
Miyazaki M
Med Law; 2007 Dec; 26(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 18284118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion in a restrictive legal context: the views of obstetrician-gynaecologists in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gogna M; Romero M; Ramos S; Petracci M; Szulik D
Reprod Health Matters; 2002 May; 10(19):128-37. PubMed ID: 12369315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Webster and women's equality.
Johnsen D; Wilder MJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chapter 2. Criminal and Criminological aspects about act N˚18.987 which legalize the abortion in Uruguay].
Montano PJ
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci; 2019 May; 30(1):61-81. PubMed ID: 31210526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion: a history.
Hovey G
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 12340403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's abortion seeking behavior under restrictive abortion laws in Mexico.
Juarez F; Bankole A; Palma JL
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226522. PubMed ID: 31881041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CMA abortion survey.
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Aug; 129(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 6861064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
