These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block. Falcão A; Chalela W; Giorgi MC; Imada R; Soares J; Do Val R; Oliveira MA; Izaki M; Kalil Filho RK; Meneghetti JC Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2015 Nov; 70(11):726-32. PubMed ID: 26602518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical PET Flow Reserve Imaging: Is There Precision to Treat Patients or Populations? Beanlands RSB; Chong AY; deKemp RA JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):578-581. PubMed ID: 28017391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Nappi C; Gaudieri V; Mainolfi CG; Green R; Cantoni V; Panico M; Klain M; Petretta M; Slomka PJ; Cuocolo A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update. Iskandrian AE; Dilsizian V; Garcia EV; Beanlands RS; Cerqueira M; Soman P; Berman DS; Cuocolo A; Einstein AJ; Morgan CJ; Hage FG; Schelbert HR; Bax JJ; Wu JC; Shaw LJ; Sadeghi MM; Tamaki N; Kaufmann PA; Gropler R; Dorbala S; Van Decker W J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 29110288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques? Caobelli F; Farina D; Pizzocaro C; Guerra UP Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 39(12):1970-2. PubMed ID: 22926711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82. Koenders SS; van Dalen JA; Jager PL; Knollema S; Timmer JR; Mouden M; Slump CH; van Dijk JD J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):204-212. PubMed ID: 32410059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimal Adenosine Stress for Maximum Stress Perfusion, Coronary Flow Reserve, and Pixel Distribution of Coronary Flow Capacity by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Analysis. Kitkungvan D; Lai D; Zhu H; Roby AE; Johnson NP; Steptoe DD; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28213449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification. van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):738-745. PubMed ID: 30790203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]