These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36795296)

  • 21. PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?
    Saraste A; Kajander S; Han C; Nesterov SV; Knuuti J
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 22733534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Falcão A; Chalela W; Giorgi MC; Imada R; Soares J; Do Val R; Oliveira MA; Izaki M; Kalil Filho RK; Meneghetti JC
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2015 Nov; 70(11):726-32. PubMed ID: 26602518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical PET Flow Reserve Imaging: Is There Precision to Treat Patients or Populations?
    Beanlands RSB; Chong AY; deKemp RA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):578-581. PubMed ID: 28017391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
    Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by
    Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Nappi C; Gaudieri V; Mainolfi CG; Green R; Cantoni V; Panico M; Klain M; Petretta M; Slomka PJ; Cuocolo A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update.
    Iskandrian AE; Dilsizian V; Garcia EV; Beanlands RS; Cerqueira M; Soman P; Berman DS; Cuocolo A; Einstein AJ; Morgan CJ; Hage FG; Schelbert HR; Bax JJ; Wu JC; Shaw LJ; Sadeghi MM; Tamaki N; Kaufmann PA; Gropler R; Dorbala S; Van Decker W
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 29110288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques?
    Caobelli F; Farina D; Pizzocaro C; Guerra UP
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 39(12):1970-2. PubMed ID: 22926711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82.
    Koenders SS; van Dalen JA; Jager PL; Knollema S; Timmer JR; Mouden M; Slump CH; van Dijk JD
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):204-212. PubMed ID: 32410059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimal Adenosine Stress for Maximum Stress Perfusion, Coronary Flow Reserve, and Pixel Distribution of Coronary Flow Capacity by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Analysis.
    Kitkungvan D; Lai D; Zhu H; Roby AE; Johnson NP; Steptoe DD; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28213449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stomach interference in
    Rasmussen T; Kjær A; Hasbak P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 29968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of two dipyridamole infusion protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Harel F; Finnerty V; Authier S; Pelletier-Galarneau M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1820-1828. PubMed ID: 30367380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Arumugam P; Tout D; Tonge C
    Br Med Bull; 2013; 107():87-100. PubMed ID: 23966422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting outcomes in heart transplantation: PET project or actionable data.
    Givertz MM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):857-9. PubMed ID: 25406196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cardiac 82Rubidium PET/CT: initial European experience.
    Groves AM; Speechly-Dick ME; Dickson JC; Kayani I; Endozo R; Blanchard P; Shastry M; Prvulovich E; Waddington WA; Ben-Haim S; Bomanji JB; McEwan JR; Ell PJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Dec; 34(12):1965-72. PubMed ID: 17768620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of rubidium imaging availability on management of patients with acute chest pain.
    Shaukat Ali A; Finnerty V; Harel F; Marquis-Gravel G; Vadeboncoeur A; Pelletier-Galarneau M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3281-3290. PubMed ID: 35199279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.
    Mc Ardle BA; Davies RA; Chen L; Small GR; Ruddy TD; Dwivedi G; Yam Y; Haddad H; Mielniczuk LM; Stadnick E; Hessian R; Guo A; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA; Chow BJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):930-7. PubMed ID: 25182366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential.
    Schindler TH
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):588-606. PubMed ID: 25637500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification.
    van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):738-745. PubMed ID: 30790203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimization of temporal sampling for
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1517-1529. PubMed ID: 28508271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.