These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36796061)
1. Abutment-Bar Structure Connection Geometry: An Important Design Parameter for Implant-Supported Bar-Retained Overdentures With Cantilever Extension. Akgün G; Kayacan R J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):330-339. PubMed ID: 36796061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs. Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture. Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Celik G; Uludag B J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments]. Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures. Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs. Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D Finite Element Analysis to Assess the Stress Distribution Pattern in Mandibular Implant-supported Overdenture with Different Bar Heights. Joshi S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 31597798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation. Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Implant Inclination on Stress Distribution in Mandibular Overdentures. Ebadian B; Mosharraf R; Khodaeian N J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23574403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants. Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interventions to Maintain Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures on Both External Hex and Internal Connection Implants: A Retrospective Study. Fernandez-Estevan L; Montero J; Selva Otaolaurruchi EJ; Sola Ruiz MF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(16):838-846. PubMed ID: 30025000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of cantilevered bar length on strain around two implants supporting a mandibular overdenture. Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Salloum MG; Elsaih EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e143-50. PubMed ID: 23748333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time. Semper W; Heberer S; Nelson K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20369100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis. Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]