These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36796063)

  • 1. Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection.
    Alberti A; Corbella S; Francetti L
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 36796063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection and Abutment Angulations on Peri-implant Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Khatib I; Joshi NV; Rao P; Joshi M; Shetty A; Thorat V; Talreja P
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2024; 45(7):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 39029968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
    de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the fracture resistance of dental implants with different abutment taper angles.
    Wang K; Geng J; Jones D; Xu W
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jun; 63():164-71. PubMed ID: 27040208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.
    Prados-Privado M; Gehrke SA; Rojo R; Prados-Frutos JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 30427957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the Prosthetic Index on Fracture Resistance of Morse Taper Dental Implants.
    Zancopé K; Dias Resende CC; Castro CG; Salatti RC; Domingues das Neves F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1333-1337. PubMed ID: 29140377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of the press-fit effect in a conical Morse taper implant system by using an in vitro experimental test and finite element analysis.
    Chang HC; Chang CH; Li HY; Wang CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):601-608. PubMed ID: 33349465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load limit of mini-implants with reduced abutment height based on fatigue fracture resistance: experimental and finite element study.
    Toyoshima Y; Wakabayashi N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):e10-6. PubMed ID: 25506647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles.
    Freitas MIM; Gomes RS; Ruggiero MM; Bergamo ETP; Bonfante EA; Marcello-Machado RM; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Mar; 110(3):638-645. PubMed ID: 34559448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fatigue tests and in silico finite element analysis of dental implants with different fixture/abutment joint types using computer-aided design models.
    Yamaguchi S; Yamanishi Y; Machado LS; Matsumoto S; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Thompson VP; Imazato S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28427837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal Torque and Biofilm Accumulation at Two Dental Implant-Abutment Joints After Fatigue.
    Pereira J; Morsch CS; Henriques B; Nascimento RM; Benfatti CA; Silva FS; López-López J; Souza JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 27447147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: A finite element analysis study.
    Lee H; Jo M; Sailer I; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):716-728. PubMed ID: 33685654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
    de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
    Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang Y; Yu P; Yu H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3610. PubMed ID: 35490303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical evaluation of an implant-abutment self-locking taper connection: finite element analysis and experimental tests.
    Sannino G; Barlattani A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e17-26. PubMed ID: 23377078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.
    Gehrke SA; Aramburú Júnior JS; Dedavid BA; Shibli JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 27183084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.