BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36797358)

  • 1. Utility of molecular subtypes and genetic alterations for evaluating clinical outcomes in 1029 patients with endometrial cancer.
    Asami Y; Kobayashi Kato M; Hiranuma K; Matsuda M; Shimada Y; Ishikawa M; Koyama T; Komatsu M; Hamamoto R; Nagashima M; Terao Y; Itakura A; Kohno T; Sekizawa A; Matsumoto K; Kato T; Shiraishi K; Yoshida H
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Apr; 128(8):1582-1591. PubMed ID: 36797358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Expression and significance of immune checkpoint B7-homolog 4 in endometrial cancer].
    Zong LJ; Xiang Y; Yu SN; Lu ZH; Chen J; Huang WH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 57(12):921-931. PubMed ID: 36562226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mismatch repair status influences response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Chung YS; Woo HY; Lee JY; Park E; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):370.e1-370.e13. PubMed ID: 33039397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.
    León-Castillo A; de Boer SM; Powell ME; Mileshkin LR; Mackay HJ; Leary A; Nijman HW; Singh N; Pollock PM; Bessette P; Fyles A; Haie-Meder C; Smit VTHBM; Edmondson RJ; Putter H; Kitchener HC; Crosbie EJ; de Bruyn M; Nout RA; Horeweg N; Creutzberg CL; Bosse T;
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(29):3388-3397. PubMed ID: 32749941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretable deep learning model to predict the molecular classification of endometrial cancer from haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images: a combined analysis of the PORTEC randomised trials and clinical cohorts.
    Fremond S; Andani S; Barkey Wolf J; Dijkstra J; Melsbach S; Jobsen JJ; Brinkhuis M; Roothaan S; Jurgenliemk-Schulz I; Lutgens LCHW; Nout RA; van der Steen-Banasik EM; de Boer SM; Powell ME; Singh N; Mileshkin LR; Mackay HJ; Leary A; Nijman HW; Smit VTHBM; Creutzberg CL; Horeweg N; Koelzer VH; Bosse T
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Feb; 5(2):e71-e82. PubMed ID: 36496303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    De Leo A; de Biase D; Lenzi J; Barbero G; Turchetti D; Grillini M; Ravegnini G; Angelini S; Zamagni C; Coluccelli S; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Perrone AM; Tallini G; Santini D; Ceccarelli C
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33668727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical impact of genetic alterations of CTNNB1 in patients with grade 3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma.
    Kobayashi Kato M; Asami Y; Takayanagi D; Matsuda M; Shimada Y; Hiranuma K; Kuno I; Komatsu M; Hamamoto R; Matsumoto K; Ishikawa M; Kohno T; Kato T; Shiraishi K; Yoshida H
    Cancer Sci; 2022 May; 113(5):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 35278272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer.
    Eriksson LSE; Nastic D; Lindqvist PG; Imboden S; Järnbert-Pettersson H; Carlson JW; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 33314410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic relevance of the molecular classification in high-grade endometrial cancer for patients staged by lymphadenectomy and without adjuvant treatment.
    Leon-Castillo A; Horeweg N; Peters EEM; Rutten T; Ter Haar N; Smit VTHBM; Kroon CD; Boennelycke M; Hogdall E; Hogdall C; Nout RRA; Creutzberg CL; Ortoft G; Bosse T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):577-586. PubMed ID: 35078648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the immune checkpoint lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) in endometrial cancer: An emerging target for immunotherapy.
    Zhang Y; Yang R; Xu C; Zhang Y; Deng M; Wu D; Tang F; Liu X; Han Y; Zhan Y; Miao J
    Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Aug; 236():153990. PubMed ID: 35749914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification.
    Siegenthaler F; Lindemann K; Epstein E; Rau TT; Nastic D; Ghaderi M; Rydberg F; Mueller MD; Carlson J; Imboden S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 35277281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of molecular profile on prognosis and relapse pattern in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer.
    Lindemann K; Kildal W; Kleppe A; Tobin KAR; Pradhan M; Isaksen MX; Vlatkovic L; Danielsen HE; Kristensen GB; Askautrud HA
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 200():113584. PubMed ID: 38330767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review.
    D'Alessandris N; Travaglino A; Santoro A; Arciuolo D; Scaglione G; Raffone A; Inzani F; Zannoni GF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 163(2):427-432. PubMed ID: 34446267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mismatch repair deficiency identifies patients with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer at the highest risk of recurrence: A prognostic biomarker.
    Backes FJ; Haag J; Cosgrove CM; Suarez A; Cohn DE; Goodfellow PJ
    Cancer; 2019 Feb; 125(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 30561762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor immune microenvironment in endometrial cancer of different molecular subtypes: evidence from a retrospective observational study.
    Dai Y; Zhao L; Hua D; Cui L; Zhang X; Kang N; Qu L; Li L; Li H; Shen D; Wang Z; Wang J
    Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1035616. PubMed ID: 36532042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer.
    Talhouk A; McConechy MK; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Senz J; Boyd N; Pike J; Anglesio M; Kwon JS; Karnezis AN; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    Cancer; 2017 Mar; 123(5):802-813. PubMed ID: 28061006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prognosis of endometrial cancers stratified with conventional risk factors and modified molecular classification.
    Yamazaki H; Asano H; Hatanaka KC; Matsuoka R; Konno Y; Matsuno Y; Hatanaka Y; Watari H
    Cancer Sci; 2022 Sep; 113(9):3134-3147. PubMed ID: 35707843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical factors as prognostic variables among molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer.
    Kolehmainen A; Pasanen A; Tuomi T; Koivisto-Korander R; Bützow R; Loukovaara M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242733. PubMed ID: 33232359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic role of transcription factor
    Onoprienko A; Hofstetter G; Muellauer L; Dorittke T; Polterauer S; Grimm C; Bartl T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38508586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative.
    Stelloo E; Bosse T; Nout RA; MacKay HJ; Church DN; Nijman HW; Leary A; Edmondson RJ; Powell ME; Crosbie EJ; Kitchener HC; Mileshkin L; Pollock PM; Smit VT; Creutzberg CL
    Mod Pathol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 25720322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.