291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36797458)
1. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.
AlJaroudi WA; Hage FG
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 30(2):452-478. PubMed ID: 36797458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.
Murphy J; AlJaroudi WA; Hage FG
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 30(3):941-954. PubMed ID: 37204688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.
Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 32410057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.
Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 28386817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.
Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1390-1399. PubMed ID: 29663117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.
Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 26892251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.
AlJaroudi WA; Hage FG
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):921-930. PubMed ID: 32410058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.
AlJaroudi WA; Hage FG
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 26(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 30603892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.
Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):714-9. PubMed ID: 25920482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic value of mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony defined by phase analysis from gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging among patients with coronary heart disease.
Hess PL; Shaw LK; Fudim M; Iskandrian AE; Borges-Neto S
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):482-490. PubMed ID: 26809439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physiological assessment of myocardial perfusion using nuclear cardiology would enhance coronary artery disease patient care: which imaging modality is best for evaluation of myocardial ischemia? (SPECT-side).
Yoshinaga K; Manabe O; Tamaki N
Circ J; 2011; 75(3):713-22; discussion 731. PubMed ID: 21301136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of the normalization of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony after revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease.
Fujito H; Yoda S; Hatta T; Miyagawa M; Tanaka Y; Fukumoto K; Suzuki Y; Matsumoto N; Okumura Y
Heart Vessels; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1395-1410. PubMed ID: 35322282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow With Positron Emission Tomography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.
Ruddy TD; Wells RG
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jun; 16(6):e015593. PubMed ID: 37313747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Positron emission tomography in cardiological practice].
Sergienko VB; Ansheles AA
Ter Arkh; 2023 Sep; 95(7):531-536. PubMed ID: 38159001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(8):1-64. PubMed ID: 23074411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Guide to Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients Presenting With Stable Angina: The RESCUE Trial.
Stillman AE; Gatsonis C; Lima JAC; Liu T; Snyder BS; Cormack J; Malholtra V; Schnall MD; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Woodard PK;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(24):e017993. PubMed ID: 33283579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current status and perspectives of nuclear cardiology.
Tamaki N; Manabe O
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 38(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 37891375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiac care.
Lugomirski P; Chow BJ; Ruddy TD
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 Nov; 12(11):1247-9. PubMed ID: 25264155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nuclear cardiology: present and future.
Russell RR; Zaret BL
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 31(9):557-629. PubMed ID: 16935694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
