155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36797632)
1. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced versus Non-enhanced Helical Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis.
Chen Y; Yang J; Cong R; Wang M; Xiao J; Zhu J; He Y; He B
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Feb; 33(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 36797632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast CT in Detecting Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.
Xiong B; Zhong B; Li Z; Zhou F; Hu R; Feng Z; Xu S; Chen F
Am Surg; 2015 Jun; 81(6):626-9. PubMed ID: 26031278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of radiology (CT, X-ray, US) for predicting difficult intubation in adults: A meta-analysis.
Ji C; Ni Q; Chen W
J Clin Anesth; 2018 Mar; 45():79-87. PubMed ID: 29306118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.
Rud B; Vejborg TS; Rappeport ED; Reitsma JB; Wille-Jørgensen P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 2019(11):. PubMed ID: 31743429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI versus CT for the detection of pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis.
Liu H; Chen R; Tong C; Liang XW
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(42):e27270. PubMed ID: 34678861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bedside ultrasonography for acute appendicitis: An updated diagnostic meta-analysis.
Shen G; Wang J; Fei F; Mao M; Mei Z
Int J Surg; 2019 Oct; 70():1-9. PubMed ID: 31404675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review.
Hlibczuk V; Dattaro JA; Jin Z; Falzon L; Brown MD
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jan; 55(1):51-59.e1. PubMed ID: 19733421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of computed tomography angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysm.
Chen X; Liu Y; Tong H; Dong Y; Ma D; Xu L; Yang C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10771. PubMed ID: 29768368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of CT for pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis in various clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DW; Yoon HM; Lee JY; Kim JH; Jung AY; Lee JS; Cho YA
Emerg Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(6):627-637. PubMed ID: 30003463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the diagnostic value of
Jia Y; Gong W; Zhang Z; Tu G; Li J; Xiong F; Hou H; Zhang Y; Wu M; Zhang L
J Thorac Dis; 2019 May; 11(5):2082-2098. PubMed ID: 31285902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Imaging versus CT for Acute Appendicitis.
Repplinger MD; Pickhardt PJ; Robbins JB; Kitchin DR; Ziemlewicz TJ; Hetzel SJ; Golden SK; Harringa JB; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):467-475. PubMed ID: 29688158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
Feng P; Li G; Liang P
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16076. PubMed ID: 37810769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT.
Kaiser S; Finnbogason T; Jorulf HK; Söderman E; Frenckner B
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 15031433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion caused by head and neck cancer: a systematic review comparing contrast-enhanced and plain computed tomography.
Li C; Men Y; Yang W; Pan J; Sun J; Li L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 72(8):1601-15. PubMed ID: 24679956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography in bone marrow edema with vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.
Yang P; Wu G; Chang X
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():124-129. PubMed ID: 29362142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of varices in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Deng H; Qi X; Guo X
Postgrad Med; 2017 Apr; 129(3):318-328. PubMed ID: 27677436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.
Naeger DM; Chang SD; Kolli P; Shah V; Huang W; Thoeni RF
Br J Radiol; 2011 May; 84(1001):418-26. PubMed ID: 20959365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
