141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36797679)
1. Should multiple imputation be stratified by exposure group when estimating causal effects via outcome regression in observational studies?
Zhang J; Dashti SG; Carlin JB; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):42. PubMed ID: 36797679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Dashti SG; Lee KJ; Simpson JA; White IR; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M
Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38400653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recoverability and estimation of causal effects under typical multivariable missingness mechanisms.
Zhang J; Dashti SG; Carlin JB; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M
Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2200326. PubMed ID: 38637322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: compatible imputation models are not sufficient to avoid bias if they are mis-specified.
Curnow E; Carpenter JR; Heron JE; Cornish RP; Rach S; Didelez V; Langeheine M; Tilling K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():100-109. PubMed ID: 37343895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of approaches for accommodating interactions and non-linear terms in multiple imputation of incomplete three-level data.
Wijesuriya R; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; De Silva AP; Lee KJ
Biom J; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1404-1425. PubMed ID: 34914127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple imputation methods for missing multilevel ordinal outcomes.
Dong M; Mitani A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 May; 23(1):112. PubMed ID: 37161419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data.
Tan PT; Cro S; Van Vogt E; Szigeti M; Cornelius VR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 33858355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Acute Stroke Trials: Advantages of Multiple Imputation Using Baseline and Postbaseline Variables.
Young-Saver DF; Gornbein J; Starkman S; Saver JL
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 30297167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian causal inference for observational studies with missingness in covariates and outcomes.
Zang H; Kim HJ; Huang B; Szczesniak R
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3624-3636. PubMed ID: 37553770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
Sperrin M; Martin GP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appropriate inclusion of interactions was needed to avoid bias in multiple imputation.
Tilling K; Williamson EJ; Spratt M; Sterne JA; Carpenter JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():107-115. PubMed ID: 27445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
