BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36797750)

  • 1. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) reduces total lifetime cost compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a cost-utility analysis in Thailand.
    Boonsirikamchai W; Phisalpapra P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 36797750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Tricalcium Phosphate and Iliac Bone Graft Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Thailand.
    Tirawanish P; Phisalprapa P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    Int J Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
    Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review.
    Bamps S; Raymaekers V; Roosen G; Put E; Vanvolsem S; Achahbar SE; Meeuws S; Wissels M; Plazier M
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Mar; 171():10-18. PubMed ID: 36521760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Tanaka S; Ouchida J; Segi N; Kobayashi K; Ando K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Sep; 45(18):E1172-E1178. PubMed ID: 32341307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
    Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Ha SS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():612-622. PubMed ID: 28602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Japanese universal health insurance system.
    Fujimori T; Miwa T; Iwasaki M; Oda T
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 29276041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Radiographic Outcomes of Lateral and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Kyphosis.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Jun; 13(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 30691257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF): Comparative Effectiveness and Safety versus PLIF/TLIF and Predictive Factors Affecting LLIF Outcome.
    Barbagallo GM; Albanese V; Raich AL; Dettori JR; Sherry N; Balsano M
    Evid Based Spine Care J; 2014 Apr; 5(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24715870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in Sagittal Alignment Following Short-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Posterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Dec; 13(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 31281175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.