These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36798184)
1. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture of gait kinematics in individuals with cerebral palsy and chronic stroke: A case study series. Steffensen EA; Magalhães F; Knarr BA; Kingston DC Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36798184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three-dimensional kinematics between markerless and marker-based motion capture in overground gait. Ripic Z; Nienhuis M; Signorile JF; Best TM; Jacobs KA; Eltoukhy M J Biomech; 2023 Oct; 159():111793. PubMed ID: 37725886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absolute Reliability of Gait Parameters Acquired With Markerless Motion Capture in Living Domains. Riazati S; McGuirk TE; Perry ES; Sihanath WB; Patten C Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():867474. PubMed ID: 35782037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. Kanko RM; Laende EK; Davis EM; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110665. PubMed ID: 34380101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients. Wren TAL; Isakov P; Rethlefsen SA Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():9-14. PubMed ID: 37285635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The applicability of markerless motion capture for clinical gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy. Wishaupt K; Schallig W; van Dorst MH; Buizer AI; van der Krogt MM Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11910. PubMed ID: 38789587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait. Horsak B; Eichmann A; Lauer K; Prock K; Krondorfer P; Siragy T; Dumphart B J Biomech; 2023 Oct; 159():111801. PubMed ID: 37738945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of kinematics and joint moments calculations for lower limbs during gait using markerless and marker-based motion capture. Huang T; Ruan M; Huang S; Fan L; Wu X Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1280363. PubMed ID: 38532880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: proof of concept. Ceseracciu E; Sawacha Z; Cobelli C PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e87640. PubMed ID: 24595273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring. Boldo M; Di Marco R; Martini E; Nardon M; Bertucco M; Bombieri N Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108101. PubMed ID: 38340440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy, Validity, and Reliability of Markerless Camera-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems versus Marker-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems in Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scataglini S; Abts E; Van Bocxlaer C; Van den Bussche M; Meletani S; Truijen S Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system. Harsted S; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Hestbæk L; Boyle E; Lauridsen HH Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():39. PubMed ID: 31417672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]