BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3679935)

  • 1. Backscatter radiation at bone-titanium interface from high-energy X and gamma rays.
    Mian TA; Van Putten MC; Kramer DC; Jacob RF; Boyer AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1987 Dec; 13(12):1943-7. PubMed ID: 3679935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric evaluation of the effect of dental implants in head and neck radiotherapy.
    Ozen J; Dirican B; Oysul K; Beyzadeoglu M; Ucok O; Beydemir B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jun; 99(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 15897862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose perturbation at tissue-titanium dental interfaces in head and neck cancer patients.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Razavi R; Thobejane S; Harter KW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jan; 34(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 8567351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of scattering effects of irradiation on surroundings using the example of titanium dental implants: a Monte Carlo approach.
    Friedrich RE; Todorovic M; Krüll A
    Anticancer Res; 2010 May; 30(5):1727-30. PubMed ID: 20592369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro backscattering from implant materials during radiotherapy.
    Wang RR; Pillai K; Jones PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jun; 75(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8725838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Backscatter radiation at tissue-titanium interfaces. Analyses of biological effects from 60Co and protons.
    Rosengren B; Wulff L; Carlsson E; Carlsson J; Montelius A; Russell K; Grusell E
    Acta Oncol; 1991; 30(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 1662525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of scatter dose of dental titanium implants exposed to photon beams of different energies and irradiation angles in head and neck radiotherapy.
    Beyzadeoglu M; Dirican B; Oysul K; Ozen J; Ucok O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16421258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measured and Monte Carlo simulated surface dose reduction for superficial X-rays incident on tissue with underlying air or bone.
    Baines J; Zawlodzka S; Markwell T; Chan M
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):926-933. PubMed ID: 29235131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose variation at bone/titanium interfaces using titanium hollow screw osseointegrating reconstruction plates.
    Allal AS; Richter M; Russo M; Rouzaud M; Dulguerov P; Kurtz JM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 9422579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect on dose of kilovoltage x-rays backscattered from lead.
    Huq MS; Venkataramanan N; Meli JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 24(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 1512154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
    Çatli S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Backscattered dose perturbation effects at metallic interfaces irradiated by high-energy X- and gamma-ray therapeutic beams.
    Ravikumar M; Ravichandran R; Sathiyan S; Supe SS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Mar; 180(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 14991206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose in bone and tissue near bone-tissue interface from electron beam.
    Shiu AS; Hogstrom KR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1991 Aug; 21(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 1869463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the X-ray spectrum at compact bone-titanium interfaces in digital dental radiography.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Koligliatis T; Donta-Bakogianni C; Karayiannis A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 17082334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary radiation from a spherical tissue-equivalent phantom irradiated with 60Co gamma radiation and 6 MV X-rays.
    Nilsson B
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Nov; 20(6):963-73. PubMed ID: 1202513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
    Gagnon WF; Horton JL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of interface effects in 60Co beams using a thin-walled parallel plate ionization chamber.
    Nilsson B; Montelius A; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1413-21. PubMed ID: 1461203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1241-50. PubMed ID: 18491516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Backscatter dose effects for high atomic number materials being irradiated in the presence of a magnetic field: A Monte Carlo study for the MRI linac.
    Ahmad SB; Sarfehnia A; Kim A; Wronski M; Sahgal A; Keller BM
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4665. PubMed ID: 27487883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scattering effects of irradiation on surroundings calculated for a small dental implant.
    Friedrich RE; Todorovic M; Heiland M; Scheuer HA; Krüll A
    Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2043-6. PubMed ID: 22593486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.