These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36800069)

  • 1. Familiarity enhances mnemonic precision but impairs mnemonic accuracy in visual working memory.
    Won BY; Park HB; Zhang W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1452-1462. PubMed ID: 36800069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face Familiarity and Image-Specific Memory.
    Kramer RSS; Berry CJ; Jones AL; Gous G
    Perception; 2020 Sep; 49(9):978-987. PubMed ID: 32741253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.
    Lorenc ES; Pratte MS; Angeloni CF; Tong F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1975-84. PubMed ID: 24627213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The anterior-ventrolateral temporal lobe contributes to boosting visual working memory capacity for items carrying semantic information.
    Chiou R; Lambon Ralph MA
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():453-461. PubMed ID: 29289617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An item's status in semantic memory determines how it is recognized: Dissociable patterns of brain activity observed for famous and unfamiliar faces.
    MacKenzie G; Alexandrou G; Hancock PJB; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():292-301. PubMed ID: 30096413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength.
    Schurgin MW; Wixted JT; Brady TF
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Nov; 4(11):1156-1172. PubMed ID: 32895546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory across a short-delay: Systematic biases in memory for faces.
    Jun J; Tan DH; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():39-49. PubMed ID: 30878000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Getting to Know You: Emerging Neural Representations during Face Familiarization.
    Ambrus GG; Eick CM; Kaiser D; Kovács G
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5687-5698. PubMed ID: 34031162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing between attributional and mnemonic sources of familiarity: the case of positive emotion bias.
    Verde MF; Stone LK; Hatch HS; Schnall S
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 20173187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
    Collins E; Robinson AK; Behrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():120-131. PubMed ID: 29966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trait anxiety is associated with a decreased visual working memory capacity for faces.
    Yao N; Chen S; Qian M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Dec; 270():474-482. PubMed ID: 30326430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How familiarity warps representation in the face space.
    Chauhan V; Kotlewska I; Tang S; Gobbini MI
    J Vis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):18. PubMed ID: 32692827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distraction biases working memory for faces.
    Mallett R; Mummaneni A; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 31907852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The modulatory effect of semantic familiarity on the audiovisual integration of face-name pairs.
    Li Y; Wang F; Huang B; Yang W; Yu T; Talsma D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Dec; 37(12):4333-4348. PubMed ID: 27401122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual difficulty modulates the direction of information flow in familiar face recognition.
    Karimi-Rouzbahani H; Ramezani F; Woolgar A; Rich A; Ghodrati M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jun; 233():117896. PubMed ID: 33667671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social threat and safety learning in individuals with adverse childhood experiences: electrocortical evidence on face processing, recognition, and working memory.
    Schellhaas S; Schmahl C; Bublatzky F
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2022; 13(2):2135195. PubMed ID: 36325256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces.
    Jackson MC; Raymond JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):556-68. PubMed ID: 18505323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.
    Brady RJ; Hampton RR
    Curr Biol; 2018 Dec; 28(24):3903-3910.e3. PubMed ID: 30503618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Robust Neural Index of High Face Familiarity.
    Wiese H; Tüttenberg SC; Ingram BT; Chan CYX; Gurbuz Z; Burton AM; Young AW
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Feb; 30(2):261-272. PubMed ID: 30557087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.