172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36800112)
61. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia.
von Knebel Doeberitz PL; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; van Assen M; Bauer MJ; Savage RH; Pannell JT; De Santis D; Johnson AA; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Schönberg SO; Nance JW; Tesche C
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387. PubMed ID: 30523456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Incremental Image Noise Reduction in Coronary CT Angiography Using a Deep Learning-Based Technique with Iterative Reconstruction.
Hong JH; Park EA; Lee W; Ahn C; Kim JH
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1165-1177. PubMed ID: 32729262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Benz DC; Benetos G; Rampidis G; von Felten E; Bakula A; Sustar A; Kudura K; Messerli M; Fuchs TA; Gebhard C; Pazhenkottil AP; Kaufmann PA; Buechel RR
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):444-451. PubMed ID: 31974008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Diagnostic performance evaluation of a computer-aided simple triage system for coronary CT angiography in patients with intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome.
Meyer M; Schoepf UJ; Fink C; Goldenberg R; Apfaltrer P; Gruettner J; Vajcs D; Schoenberg SO; Henzler T
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 23735619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. What is the optimal number of readers needed to achieve high diagnostic accuracy in coronary computed tomographic angiography? A comparison of alternate reader combinations.
LaBounty TM; Leipsic J; Srichai MB; Mancini GB; Lin FY; Dunning AM; Min JK
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(6):384-90. PubMed ID: 21030335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Jiang W; Pan Y; Hu Y; Leng X; Jiang J; Feng L; Xia Y; Sun Y; Wang J; Xiang J; Li C
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Aug; 20(1):77. PubMed ID: 34348731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Diagnostic accuracy of Visipaque enhanced coronary computed tomographic angiography: a prospective multicenter trial.
Budoff MJ; Kalia N; Cole J; Nakanishi R; Nezarat N; Thomas JL
Coron Artery Dis; 2017 Jan; 28(1):52-56. PubMed ID: 27755006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
Baumann S; Renker M; Hetjens S; Fuller SR; Becher T; Loßnitzer D; Lehmann R; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Lang S; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 27639627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Subtraction improves the accuracy of coronary CT angiography for detecting obstructive disease in severely calcified segments.
Xu L; Li F; Wu K; Zhong Z; Huang R; Xu Y; Wang Z; Yang Z; He Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 34142220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2460-2471. PubMed ID: 31005531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: what constitutes sufficient training?
Pugliese F; Hunink MG; Gruszczynska K; Alberghina F; Malagó R; van Pelt N; Mollet NR; Cademartiri F; Weustink AC; Meijboom WB; Witteman CL; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 19401570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Radiomics features of pericoronary adipose tissue improve CT-FFR performance in predicting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.
Yu L; Chen X; Ling R; Yu Y; Yang W; Sun J; Zhang J
Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):2004-2014. PubMed ID: 36258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Evaluation of stenosis severity of coronary calcified lesions using transluminal attenuation gradient: clinical application of 320-row volume CT.
Yang F; Dong J; Wang W; Wang X; Fu X; Kumar NC; Zhang T
Minerva Med; 2017 Aug; 108(4):305-316. PubMed ID: 28248067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion.
Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Ahn JM; Kweon J; Lee JB; Choi SH; Shin ES; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 18(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 27354345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Interobserver variability among expert readers quantifying plaque volume and plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography: a CLARIFY trial sub-study.
Jonas RA; Weerakoon S; Fisher R; Griffin WF; Kumar V; Rahban H; Marques H; Karlsberg RP; Jennings RS; Crabtree TR; Choi AD; Earls JP
Clin Imaging; 2022 Nov; 91():19-25. PubMed ID: 35986973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Context-aware deep network for coronary artery stenosis classification in coronary CT angiography.
Wang X; Leng S; Lu Z; Huang S; Lee BH; Baskaran L; Yew MS; Teo L; Chan MY; Ngiam KY; Lee HK; Zhong L; Huang W
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.
Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Improving CCTA-based lesions' hemodynamic significance assessment by accounting for partial volume modeling in automatic coronary lumen segmentation.
Freiman M; Nickisch H; Prevrhal S; Schmitt H; Vembar M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Donnelly P; Goshen L
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1040-1049. PubMed ID: 28112409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The effect of coronary calcification on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based CT-FFR: a Chinese multicenter study.
Di Jiang M; Zhang XL; Liu H; Tang CX; Li JH; Wang YN; Xu PP; Zhou CS; Zhou F; Lu MJ; Zhang JY; Yu MM; Hou Y; Zheng MW; Zhang B; Zhang DM; Yi Y; Xu L; Hu XH; Yang J; Lu GM; Ni QQ; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1482-1493. PubMed ID: 32929641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
Takagi H; Tanaka R; Nagata K; Ninomiya R; Arakita K; Schuijf JD; Yoshioka K
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():30-37. PubMed ID: 29571798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
