These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3680146)

  • 1. Test of auditory comprehension: a comparison of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Brown JR
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jul; 26(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 3680146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current state of knowledge: perceptual processing by children with hearing impairment.
    Jerger S
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):754-65. PubMed ID: 17982363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current state of knowledge: speech recognition and production in children with hearing impairment.
    Eisenberg LS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 17982364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Valentine S; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.
    Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Bonduelle M; Barnes J; Nekkebroeck J; Loft A; Wennerholm UB; Tarlatzis BC; Peters C; Hagberg BS; Berner A; Sutcliffe AG
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e283-9. PubMed ID: 15741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Lexical outcomes in auditory closure in children with sensorineural hearing loss].
    Reeh M; Kiese-Himmel C
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 17337896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.
    Strelcyk O; Christoforidis D; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1878-88. PubMed ID: 19813802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological processing, language, and literacy: a comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment.
    Briscoe J; Bishop DV; Norbury CF
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 Mar; 42(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 11321202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.