These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36801503)

  • 1. What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111598. PubMed ID: 36801503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving latent conflict: What happens when latent print examiners enter the cage?
    Rairden A; Garrett BL; Kelley S; Murrie D; Castillo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():215-222. PubMed ID: 29933202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 36870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
    Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Busey TA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Apr; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 30953242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latent Print Proficiency Testing: An Examination of Test Respondents, Test-Taking Procedures, and Test Characteristics.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Pan KDH
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):450-457. PubMed ID: 31509243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for quantifying individual decision thresholds of latent print examiners.
    Luby A
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 7():100340. PubMed ID: 37448982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.