146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36802769)
21. Prediction of High-Risk Cytogenetic Status in Multiple Myeloma Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Utility of Radiomics and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods.
Liu J; Zeng P; Guo W; Wang C; Geng Y; Lang N; Yuan H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Oct; 54(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33979466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.
Weng WH; Wagholikar KB; McCray AT; Szolovits P; Chueh HC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 29191207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiomics MRI Phenotyping with Machine Learning to Predict the Grade of Lower-Grade Gliomas: A Study Focused on Nonenhancing Tumors.
Park YW; Choi YS; Ahn SS; Chang JH; Kim SH; Lee SK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 31464116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.
Kunimatsu A; Kunimatsu N; Yasaka K; Akai H; Kamiya K; Watadani T; Mori H; Abe O
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29769456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning trained with quantitative susceptibility mapping to detect mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.
Shibata H; Uchida Y; Inui S; Kan H; Sakurai K; Oishi N; Ueki Y; Oishi K; Matsukawa N
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2022 Jan; 94():104-110. PubMed ID: 34906915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.
Silva FR; Vidotti VG; Cremasco F; Dias M; Gomi ES; Costa VP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23929078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning classifiers do not improve prediction of hospitalization > 2 days after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty compared with a classical statistical risk model.
Johannesdottir KB; Kehlet H; Petersen PB; Aasvang EK; Sørensen HBD; Jørgensen CC;
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():117-123. PubMed ID: 34984485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
Lee J; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Ha A; Kim YW; Park KH
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31848786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Brain tumor detection using statistical and machine learning method.
Amin J; Sharif M; Raza M; Saba T; Anjum MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():69-79. PubMed ID: 31319962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The pneumonia severity index: Assessment and comparison to popular machine learning classifiers.
Wang D; Willis DR; Yih Y
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jul; 163():104778. PubMed ID: 35487075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predicting sustainable arsenic mitigation using machine learning techniques.
Singh SK; Taylor RW; Pradhan B; Shirzadi A; Pham BT
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Mar; 232():113271. PubMed ID: 35121252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods.
Wang X; Wan Q; Chen H; Li Y; Li X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 32222795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier of Knee MRI Reports in Two Large Academic Radiology Practices: A Tool to Estimate Diagnostic Yield.
Hassanpour S; Langlotz CP; Amrhein TJ; Befera NT; Lungren MP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):750-753. PubMed ID: 28140627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying disease genes using machine learning and gene functional similarities, assessed through Gene Ontology.
Asif M; Martiniano HFMCM; Vicente AM; Couto FM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208626. PubMed ID: 30532199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Machine Learning-Based Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics for Prediction of H3K27M Mutation in Midline Gliomas.
Kandemirli SG; Kocak B; Naganawa S; Ozturk K; Yip SSF; Chopra S; Rivetti L; Aldine AS; Jones K; Cayci Z; Moritani T; Sato TS
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e78-e85. PubMed ID: 33819703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enhancing classification in correlative microscopy using multiple classifier systems with dynamic selection.
Bitrus S; Fitzek H; Rigger E; Rattenberger J; Entner D
Ultramicroscopy; 2022 Oct; 240():113567. PubMed ID: 35717685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preoperative MRI-Based Radiomic Machine-Learning Nomogram May Accurately Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant Soft-Tissue Lesions: A Two-Center Study.
Wang H; Zhang J; Bao S; Liu J; Hou F; Huang Y; Chen H; Duan S; Hao D; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):873-882. PubMed ID: 32112598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non-invasive thyroid detection based on electroglottogram signal using machine learning classifiers.
Sai PV; Rajalakshmi T; Snekhalatha U
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Oct; 235(10):1128-1145. PubMed ID: 34176352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
