140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36802769)
21. Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.
Kunimatsu A; Kunimatsu N; Yasaka K; Akai H; Kamiya K; Watadani T; Mori H; Abe O
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29769456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Machine learning trained with quantitative susceptibility mapping to detect mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.
Shibata H; Uchida Y; Inui S; Kan H; Sakurai K; Oishi N; Ueki Y; Oishi K; Matsukawa N
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2022 Jan; 94():104-110. PubMed ID: 34906915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.
Silva FR; Vidotti VG; Cremasco F; Dias M; Gomi ES; Costa VP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23929078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Machine learning classifiers do not improve prediction of hospitalization > 2 days after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty compared with a classical statistical risk model.
Johannesdottir KB; Kehlet H; Petersen PB; Aasvang EK; Sørensen HBD; Jørgensen CC;
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():117-123. PubMed ID: 34984485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
Lee J; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Ha A; Kim YW; Park KH
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31848786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Brain tumor detection using statistical and machine learning method.
Amin J; Sharif M; Raza M; Saba T; Anjum MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():69-79. PubMed ID: 31319962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The pneumonia severity index: Assessment and comparison to popular machine learning classifiers.
Wang D; Willis DR; Yih Y
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jul; 163():104778. PubMed ID: 35487075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting sustainable arsenic mitigation using machine learning techniques.
Singh SK; Taylor RW; Pradhan B; Shirzadi A; Pham BT
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Mar; 232():113271. PubMed ID: 35121252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods.
Wang X; Wan Q; Chen H; Li Y; Li X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 32222795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier of Knee MRI Reports in Two Large Academic Radiology Practices: A Tool to Estimate Diagnostic Yield.
Hassanpour S; Langlotz CP; Amrhein TJ; Befera NT; Lungren MP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):750-753. PubMed ID: 28140627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifying disease genes using machine learning and gene functional similarities, assessed through Gene Ontology.
Asif M; Martiniano HFMCM; Vicente AM; Couto FM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208626. PubMed ID: 30532199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Machine Learning-Based Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics for Prediction of H3K27M Mutation in Midline Gliomas.
Kandemirli SG; Kocak B; Naganawa S; Ozturk K; Yip SSF; Chopra S; Rivetti L; Aldine AS; Jones K; Cayci Z; Moritani T; Sato TS
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e78-e85. PubMed ID: 33819703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhancing classification in correlative microscopy using multiple classifier systems with dynamic selection.
Bitrus S; Fitzek H; Rigger E; Rattenberger J; Entner D
Ultramicroscopy; 2022 Oct; 240():113567. PubMed ID: 35717685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preoperative MRI-Based Radiomic Machine-Learning Nomogram May Accurately Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant Soft-Tissue Lesions: A Two-Center Study.
Wang H; Zhang J; Bao S; Liu J; Hou F; Huang Y; Chen H; Duan S; Hao D; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):873-882. PubMed ID: 32112598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Non-invasive thyroid detection based on electroglottogram signal using machine learning classifiers.
Sai PV; Rajalakshmi T; Snekhalatha U
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Oct; 235(10):1128-1145. PubMed ID: 34176352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Semiquantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for accurate classification of complex adnexal masses.
Kazerooni AF; Malek M; Haghighatkhah H; Parviz S; Nabil M; Torbati L; Assili S; Saligheh Rad H; Gity M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):418-427. PubMed ID: 27367786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Longitudinal structural and perfusion MRI enhanced by machine learning outperforms standalone modalities and radiological expertise in high-grade glioma surveillance.
Siakallis L; Sudre CH; Mulholland P; Fersht N; Rees J; Topff L; Thust S; Jager R; Cardoso MJ; Panovska-Griffiths J; Bisdas S
Neuroradiology; 2021 Dec; 63(12):2047-2056. PubMed ID: 34047805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.
Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Zhang Z; Zangwill LM; Hao J; Lee TW; Sejnowski TJ; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1322-9. PubMed ID: 15790898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
